Neighbourhood Regeneration at the Grassroots Participation: Incubators’ Co-Creative Process and System

Caneparo, Luca; Bonavero, Federica

doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v10i2.960

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rational master planning transformed into process planning. Then, the strategic paradigm which created long-, mid- and short-term visions gained significance in the 1980s and 1990s, along with the practice of participation (Caneparo and Bonavero, 2016). How does this apply to Central and Eastern European countries?…”

Section: Appropriation and Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory place-making in the renewal of post-Communist large prefabricated housing estate

Benkő

Balla

Hory

2018

JPMD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce a Central-European perspective into the international discussion of the participatory place-making. The research focuses on the renewal of the large prefabricated housing estates, dominant type of urban housing in the area where after the privatisation process resident-owners own only a so-called floating plot under their block. In total, 80 per cent of the land of the whole neighbourhood remains public. The question is how participatory place-making works in this specific urban, social and cultural situation? Design/methodology/approach By introducing the topic from a theoretical point of view, the study is based on research conducted in Budapest’s Újpalota Housing Estate. Fieldwork, project analysis and interviews uncover the complexity of this Hungarian case where appropriation of residents, municipality and European social regeneration projects are simultaneously present with different types of participatory methods. Findings The majority of real changes in Újpalota – as well as in housing estates of post-Communist countries in general – are led by individual or common appropriation that sometimes becomes convincing participation. This informal transformation of the built or natural environment can create a small sense of place everywhere. At the same time, it can work against the architectural and urban character of a neighbourhood or a building, rendering a feeling of disorder. Originality/value The paper based on this Hungarian case shows that the real culture of participatory place-making is still missing in post-Communist context, and despite some good examples, the majority of people are inactive, waiting for changes to be made by leaders.

show abstract

Section: Appropriation and Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory place-making in the renewal of post-Communist large prefabricated housing estate

Benkő

Balla

Hory

2018

JPMD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further, “the grassroots reception of local development strategies is essential for their survival” (Hall and Hubbard, 1996: 165) because projects that do not take into account the needs of local communities can create strong opposition (Harvey, 1987). A grassroots movement uses the self-organized collective action of the members of a local community as driver for change (Caneparo and Bonavero, 2016). However, the role of public and entrepreneurial city initiatives based upon the engagement of citizens is still largely ignored in this stream of research.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grassroots movements and the entrepreneurial city

Wolf

Amstutz

Schuchert

et al. 2018

The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Becoming more entrepreneurial in their government approaches is a concept aimed at supporting today’s cities in dealing with complex challenges. However, to date, knowledge about how cities can apply such approaches still remains a puzzle. This article presents the case study of the Neubad Lucerne initiative in order to contribute to the generation of a comprehensive picture and of instructive knowledge for city municipalities on their way toward an entrepreneurial city. It asks particularly how city governments and municipalities can stimulate grassroots initiatives toward an entrepreneurial city in a play way instead of a managerial way. The focus is therefore on playful rather than managerial city government processes that stimulate the emergence and activities of grassroots initiatives, the role and organizing mechanisms of networks that develop, and the role of temporary spaces in enabling activity and the construction of social identity.

show abstract

“…In some cases, the process of shaping place, before the second stage, will need the meeting with stakeholders for the socialization of physical implementation development. Caneparo & Bonavero (2016) mentions the scene by the incubators co-creative process and system. This process will assist the implementation of the third stage is the synergy between stakeholders.…”

Section: The Process Of Shaping Placementioning

confidence: 99%

The Process of Shaping Place in Residential Area Towards Livable Neighbourhood

Aulia

Marpaung

Zahrah

2018

AjQoL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of shaping place in the residential area occurs on sustainability. Although in the area of planned settlement, changes always take place in the process of shaping place. This study was conducted to observe the changes and how the process can increasing Livable Neighborhood. The variables of change are management strategies, public areas, and activity generators, planning strategies, and design strategies. The results found that it takes cooperation between housing stakeholders to create a livable neighborhood.Keywords: place shaping; residential area; livable neighbourhood.eISSN 2398-4279 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v3i13.175

show abstract

Neighbourhood Regeneration at the Grassroots Participation: Incubators’ Co-Creative Process and System

Abstract: Incubators of Public Spaces is a funded JPI Urban

Cited by 10 publications

References 45 publications

Participatory place-making in the renewal of post-Communist large prefabricated housing estate

Participatory place-making in the renewal of post-Communist large prefabricated housing estate

Grassroots movements and the entrepreneurial city

The Process of Shaping Place in Residential Area Towards Livable Neighbourhood

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About