2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0094-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the younger women paid a testing service that promised to provide her with advice on optimizing her sporting activities, based on data from 23andMe, but the results contained no relevant information. Fundamentally, participants agreed with expert opinion that regulatory oversight is needed to ensure the quality and safety of DTC testing services (Nordgren, 2014).…”
Section: Maintainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the younger women paid a testing service that promised to provide her with advice on optimizing her sporting activities, based on data from 23andMe, but the results contained no relevant information. Fundamentally, participants agreed with expert opinion that regulatory oversight is needed to ensure the quality and safety of DTC testing services (Nordgren, 2014).…”
Section: Maintainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of them promise practical benefits and use prestigious words indicative of strong health benefits. In particular, it is common to appeal to ''empowerment'' and ''identity'' (Nordgren and Juengst 2009;Nordgren 2012)-concepts that are potentially appealing to consumers. DNA information is said to empower the individual, that is, help them take control over their own health by providing access to genetic information and stimulating them to take medical or preventive measures.…”
Section: Personalized Nutrition Services On the Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus clear that there is a need for legal regulation of nutrigenomic genetic testing (Nordgren 2012).…”
Section: Personalized Nutrition Services On the Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These finding must be considered in the light of previous research which has demonstrated that intentions or attitudes may not always predict behaviour [32]. In addition, although individuals state they wish to use genetic information to modify risk, studies of direct to consumer genetic testing have so far shown it does not lead to changes in behaviour relating to exercise and diet, or lead to further screening and preventative action [33,34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%