2005
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-s4-s22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NemaFootPrinter: a web based software for the identification of conserved non-coding genome sequence regions between C. elegans and C. briggsae

Abstract: BackgroundNemaFootPrinter (Nematode Transcription Factor Scan Through Philogenetic Footprinting) is a web-based software for interactive identification of conserved, non-exonic DNA segments in the genomes of C. elegans and C. briggsae. It has been implemented according to the following project specifications:a) Automated identification of orthologous gene pairs.b) Interactive selection of the boundaries of the genes to be compared.c) Pairwise sequence comparison with a range of different methods.d) Identificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many excellent alignment tools were not evaluated because: they did not meet one of the above criteria; their algorithms were similar to one of five tools we selected; and/or they did not show a significantly different performance in other evaluations. For example, ACANA [ 21 ], BLASTZ [ 76 ], MUMmer [ 77 ], and SSEARCH [ 78 ] were not selected because of the first criterion, and T-COFFEE [ 22 ], POA [ 79 ] and MAFFT [ 80 ] were not evaluated due to the second criterion. Our study is therefore not considered to be a systematic evaluation of all available good alignment tools and rather as a representative but somewhat subjective cross-section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many excellent alignment tools were not evaluated because: they did not meet one of the above criteria; their algorithms were similar to one of five tools we selected; and/or they did not show a significantly different performance in other evaluations. For example, ACANA [ 21 ], BLASTZ [ 76 ], MUMmer [ 77 ], and SSEARCH [ 78 ] were not selected because of the first criterion, and T-COFFEE [ 22 ], POA [ 79 ] and MAFFT [ 80 ] were not evaluated due to the second criterion. Our study is therefore not considered to be a systematic evaluation of all available good alignment tools and rather as a representative but somewhat subjective cross-section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other projects likeN emaFootPrinter [13] or the Centerfor Biological Sequence Analysis' (CBS) Genome Atlas Database [14] applyW eb servicest oa ccess genome annotation databases. At the EBI [15] many resources area ccessibleb ym eanso fW eb services.Theservicesoffer diversepossibilitiesfor the useofanalysistools, homology searches, multiple alignment, structural analysis, text mining or data retrieval.…”
Section: Accessing Remote Heterogeneous Information: Weband Grid Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rambaldi et al . [8] developed NemaFootPrinter (Nematode Transcription Factor Scan Through Phylogenetic Footprinting), a web-based software for interactive identification of conserved, non-exonic DNA segments in their genomes. This software relies on the identification of orthologous genes and on the manual selection of gene boundaries.…”
Section: Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%