2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605806113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nematic quantum critical point without magnetism in FeSe 1− x S x superconductors

Abstract: In most unconventional superconductors, the importance of antiferromagnetic fluctuations is widely acknowledged. In addition, cuprate and iron-pnictide high-temperature superconductors often exhibit unidirectional (nematic) electronic correlations, including stripe and orbital orders, whose fluctuations may also play a key role for electron pairing. In these materials, however, such nematic correlations are intertwined with antiferromagnetic or charge orders, preventing the identification of the essential role… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

19
150
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
19
150
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 is that ζ (100) becomes maximum right at the nematic QCP, which clearly suggests that it is directly associated with quantum critical fluctuations. In a recent elastoresistance study on the FeSe 1−x S x system [9], the nematic signal along the (110) direction is found to be largest at the nematic QCP, which is different from the Co-doped Ba-122 system [3] and our results. Since an obvious difference between FeSe 1−x S x and Ba-122 systems is the lack of AF order in the former, the large thermal critical fluctuations present in the underdoped Ba-122 samples may be attributed to the fluctuations of striped AF order [28][29][30][31], which gives the same rotational symmetry breaking as the nematic order.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 is that ζ (100) becomes maximum right at the nematic QCP, which clearly suggests that it is directly associated with quantum critical fluctuations. In a recent elastoresistance study on the FeSe 1−x S x system [9], the nematic signal along the (110) direction is found to be largest at the nematic QCP, which is different from the Co-doped Ba-122 system [3] and our results. Since an obvious difference between FeSe 1−x S x and Ba-122 systems is the lack of AF order in the former, the large thermal critical fluctuations present in the underdoped Ba-122 samples may be attributed to the fluctuations of striped AF order [28][29][30][31], which gives the same rotational symmetry breaking as the nematic order.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Xa, The normal-state electronic states in many iron-based superconductors show strong in-plane anisotropic properties that break the fourfold rotational symmetry of the lattice due to the presence of nematic order [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The nematic order is typically accompanied by a structural transition at T s following an antiferromagnetic (AF) transition at T N ≤ T s , except for FeSe where no AF order is found [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The S-substitution for Se introduces chemical pressure in FeSe, and T s gradually decreases with increasing S content x [219]. The structural/nematic transition is completely suppressed at x = 0.17, where the nematic fluctuations were found to diverge toward T → 0 K from the measurements of nematic susceptibility [219]. This result shows that the nematic quantum critical point (QCP) exists around x = 0.17 [219].…”
Section: Comparison In Phase Diagram Between Bulk Single Crystal and mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In bulk single crystals, the detailed phase diagram of FeSe under hydrostatic pressures [216][217][218] and FeSe 1−x S x [219,220] have been reported because the high-quality single crystals of FeSe 1−x S x and FeSe can be available. The S-substitution for Se introduces chemical pressure in FeSe, and T s gradually decreases with increasing S content x [219]. The structural/nematic transition is completely suppressed at x = 0.17, where the nematic fluctuations were found to diverge toward T → 0 K from the measurements of nematic susceptibility [219].…”
Section: Comparison In Phase Diagram Between Bulk Single Crystal and mentioning
confidence: 99%