“…This can be explained by the fact that the aforementioned study was conducted exclusively on stray dogs, and parasites were screened by necropsy, probably allowing a better sensitivity comparing to the microscopic fecal examination alone (Lahmar et al, 2017). Prevalence rates reported in other regions from the Mediterranean Basin were widely different and ranged from 22% in France to 71.3% in Spain (Franc et al, 1997;Awadallah and Salem, 2015;Gurler et al, 2015;Kostopoulou et al, 2017;Matallah et al, 2018;Scaramozzino et al, 2018;Sanchez-Thevenet et al, 2019). This variation can be attributed to several factors including the study area, the diagnostic techniques used for the detection of parasites, the studied populations and their living 6.5 a 11.2 a 9.5 a 1.1 a Dipylidium caninum (%) 0 a 1 a 0 a 1.1 a Trichuris vulpis (%) 0 a 0 a 1.5 a 0 a Taenia spp.…”