1976
DOI: 10.3146/i0095-3679-3-2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nematode Survey of Peanuts and Cotton in Southwest Georgia

Abstract: A random survey of 467 peanut and cotton fields in 17 counties of Southwest Georgia was conducted to determine the frequency of occurrence and distribution of parasitic nematodes associated with peanuts and cotton. Meloidogyne species were present in 9.7% of the peanut field soil samples, Pratylenchus spp. (primarily brachyurus) in 16.9% and Criconemoides ornatus in 97%. Sixty-nine percent of the rootknot associated with peanuts was M. hapla, 25% was M. arenaria and 6% was a mixture of both. Sting nematodes, B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the most economically important plant parasitic nematodes today. The focus of this study is Meloidogyne arenaria , the peanut root nematode, a polyploid asexual species responsible for significant crop damage in the southeastern United States (Blanc‐Mathieu et al, ; Ingram & Rodriguez‐Kabana, ; Motsinger, Crawford, & Thompson, ; Starr & Morgan, ; Wheeler & Starr, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the most economically important plant parasitic nematodes today. The focus of this study is Meloidogyne arenaria , the peanut root nematode, a polyploid asexual species responsible for significant crop damage in the southeastern United States (Blanc‐Mathieu et al, ; Ingram & Rodriguez‐Kabana, ; Motsinger, Crawford, & Thompson, ; Starr & Morgan, ; Wheeler & Starr, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peanut root‐knot nematode is also an important pathogen in many peanut production areas of the world. In the USA, this nematode is a significant pathogen in peanut fields in Georgia (Motsinger et al, 1976), Texas (Wheeler and Starr, 1987), Alabama (Ingram and Rodriguez‐Kabana, 1980), and North Carolina (Schmitt and Barker, 1988). The development of resistant cultivars will reduce yield losses and pesticide inputs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%