2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40152-021-00255-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neo-liberal or not? Creeping enclosures and openings in the making of fisheries governance

Abstract: Neo-liberalism can mean different things from different perspectives. Social scientists tend to use the concept to identify and critique trends of privatization, marketization, commodification and enclosures, and their associated slew of exclusionary, dispossessive, and regressive effects. Counterintuitively, governmentality analyses identify how practices of collaboration, inclusion, participation, and empowerment—practices sometimes cited as means to resist and generate alternatives to neo-liberalism—are not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second most frequently mentioned cause is access restriction. Indeed, several studies attribute neoliberal, rights‐based, fishing laws to the exclusion of some small‐scale fishers through access mechanisms (Frawley et al, 2019; Parlee & Foley, 2022; Pinkerton & Davis, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second most frequently mentioned cause is access restriction. Indeed, several studies attribute neoliberal, rights‐based, fishing laws to the exclusion of some small‐scale fishers through access mechanisms (Frawley et al, 2019; Parlee & Foley, 2022; Pinkerton & Davis, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%