Neo‐republicanism, Old Imperialism, and Migration Ethics

Hoye, J. Matthew

doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12259

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While, in the case of EU migration governance, the institutions may be accountable in a formal sense, those subjected are typically not in a situation where they, in practice, can influence or contest actions that harm them. Classical Neo‐republican theory is mainly concerned with the non‐domination of citizens rather than with aliens, but also lends itself to assessments of migration control as part of a nation's migration policy (Hoye, ) and what counts as domination of foreigners beyond national borders (Honohan, ; Culp et al, ).…”

Section: The Limits Of Sovereign States’ Discretionary Power In Migramentioning

confidence: 99%

Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya

Palm

2020

Theoria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Can state sovereignty justify privileged receiving countries exercising authority over non‐members in a third country to safeguard their own interests? Under the current migration governance of the EU, state sovereignty is manifested in migrant interdiction, interception and detention policies employed to prevent unauthorized migrants from reaching the EU, and even from attempting to embark on cross‐Mediterranean journeys. While reinforcement of the Schengen region's external borders is a key aim of the EU's internal migration politics, collaboration with third countries regarding migration control has, in the last decade, become a key feature of its external migration policy. In close collaboration with third countries, the EU has managed to curb the outflux of migrants from transit and sending countries. In effect, irregular migrants are prevented from exiting as well as from entering. This article explores the justifiability of such practices, by questioning commonly invoked models of justification such as the sovereignty “model”, with a special focus on partnership agreements regarding migration control between the EU and Libya.

show abstract

Section: The Limits Of Sovereign States’ Discretionary Power In Migramentioning

confidence: 99%

Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya

Palm

2020

Theoria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Neo‐republicanism, Old Imperialism, and Migration Ethics

Cited by 1 publication

References 8 publications

Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya

Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About