2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant treatment response and outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: Establishing oncologic benchmarks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the exact mechanisms of the lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment response among obese patients, we observed a clear relationship between treatment response as an early response indicator and long-term recurrence free survival in both the obese and non-obese patients 10 . There was no apparent interaction between obesity and treatment response as a predictor of recurrence risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Regardless of the exact mechanisms of the lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment response among obese patients, we observed a clear relationship between treatment response as an early response indicator and long-term recurrence free survival in both the obese and non-obese patients 10 . There was no apparent interaction between obesity and treatment response as a predictor of recurrence risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, whether pCR is the optimal endpoint remains controversial versus the more traditional outcome of DFS or OS. Retrospective analyses have suggested that pCR is a potential surrogate for DFS or OS [ 71 , 72 ]. These findings must be validated prospectively in a phase III trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%