2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neocortical neurodegeneration in young adult Wistar rats prenatally exposed to ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As revealed by a significant increase in the number of single-labeled BrdU + cells and of BrdU + cells that double-label NeuN, this effect that was evident at both doses (1 and 3 g/kg) and both ages (P0 and P15) tested. In contrast, prenatal ethanol had no effect on the number of GFAP + cells in these areas, indicating no change in gliogenesis, consistent with some studies in other brain areas (Ramos et al, 2002; Uban et al, 2010), or on TUNEL + cells, indicating no effect on apoptosis as previously found in hippocampus and cortex (Fakoya and Caxton-Martins, 2006; Rubert et al, 2006). These newly generated neurons stimulated by in utero ethanol exposure expressed the peptides, as demonstrated by an increased density of BrdU + cells that co-labeled ENK in the PVN and NAcC, GAL in the PVN, and OX in the PFLH, and they were evident in precisely the same areas where peptide expression is stimulated by ethanol intake in adults (Barson et al, 2011; Morganstern et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As revealed by a significant increase in the number of single-labeled BrdU + cells and of BrdU + cells that double-label NeuN, this effect that was evident at both doses (1 and 3 g/kg) and both ages (P0 and P15) tested. In contrast, prenatal ethanol had no effect on the number of GFAP + cells in these areas, indicating no change in gliogenesis, consistent with some studies in other brain areas (Ramos et al, 2002; Uban et al, 2010), or on TUNEL + cells, indicating no effect on apoptosis as previously found in hippocampus and cortex (Fakoya and Caxton-Martins, 2006; Rubert et al, 2006). These newly generated neurons stimulated by in utero ethanol exposure expressed the peptides, as demonstrated by an increased density of BrdU + cells that co-labeled ENK in the PVN and NAcC, GAL in the PVN, and OX in the PFLH, and they were evident in precisely the same areas where peptide expression is stimulated by ethanol intake in adults (Barson et al, 2011; Morganstern et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Necrosis is the major cell death phenotype in the brain following acute neonatal HI injury in rat pup forms of neurodegeneration in the developing brain similar to Bcontinuum^cell death has been previously described and termed Bpathological apoptosis^and excitotoxic neurodegeneration [37]. Similar to earlier studies [38], our study was histologically observed that ethanol caused significant damage on brain cortex tissue. Especially on neurons, the damage was evident in terms of necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, a previous study showed that pregnant guinea pigs can be successfully exposed to moderate ethanol concentrations using a 24-hour voluntary drinking paradigm, which is expected to be less stressful (Shea et al, 2012). It is also important to determine whether ethanol exposure during the equivalent to the first and second trimesters of human pregnancy (i.e., pregnancy in rodents; Clancy et al, 2007) also causes fetal brain micro-hemorrhages and whether these contribute to the morphological and functional alterations that have been detected in different brain regions, including the cerebral cortex (Kuhn and Miller, 1998, Climent et al, 2002, Fakoya and Caxton-Martins, 2006, El Shawa et al, 2013, Abbott et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%