2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neocuproine as a Redox-Active Ligand Platform on Iron and Cobalt

Abstract: A family of bis(neocuproine) complexes of Fe 2+ and Co 2+ have been investigated for neocuproine redox noninnocence. A series of redox isomers of M(neocuproine) 2 n+ (where n = 2, 1, 0 for Co and n = 2, 0 for Fe) have been synthesized and thoroughly characterized. The electronic structure of these complexes has been rigorously investigated using a variety of techniques, including X-ray absorption spectroscopy, Mossbauer spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, and magnetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 H NMR spectrum of 2 in C 6 D 5 CD 3 reveals 6 paramagnetic peaks from δ = 0 to −60 ppm that are in the same region as peaks seen for Fe­(Cl)­(ttppc) and Fe­(OH)­(ttppc) (Figure ) and the related Fe­(Cl)­(tpc) (tpc = triphenylcorrolato 3– ). , These resonances have been assigned to the β-CH pyrrole protons for iron triphenylcorrole complexes. , The 19 F { 1 H} NMR spectrum of 2 in C 6 D 5 CD 3 has a broad peak at δ = −76.4 ppm (full width at half-maximum (fwhm) = 692 Hz), which can be compared to the sharp resonance for AgOTf in the same solvent at −76.5 ppm (fwhm = 2.82 Hz) (Figure S4). The broad line in C 6 D 5 CD 3 is consistent with coordination of the triflate ligand to the paramagnetic iron center, although tight binding of OTf – is expected to give a larger downfield shift for the OTf – peak. , In contrast, the 1 H NMR spectrum of 2 in the presence of CD 3 CN (CD 3 CN/C 6 D 5 CD 3 (1/1 v/v) exhibits paramagnetic peaks between 0 and −50 ppm that are shifted from neat C 6 D 5 CD 3 (Figure S5). The corresponding 19 F { 1 H} NMR spectrum exhibits a much sharper peak at δ = −77.73 ppm (fwhm = 127 Hz), consistent with displacement of the OTf – axial ligand by CH 3 CN, as indicated by the UV–vis spectra in the same solvent (Figure S3).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 1 H NMR spectrum of 2 in C 6 D 5 CD 3 reveals 6 paramagnetic peaks from δ = 0 to −60 ppm that are in the same region as peaks seen for Fe­(Cl)­(ttppc) and Fe­(OH)­(ttppc) (Figure ) and the related Fe­(Cl)­(tpc) (tpc = triphenylcorrolato 3– ). , These resonances have been assigned to the β-CH pyrrole protons for iron triphenylcorrole complexes. , The 19 F { 1 H} NMR spectrum of 2 in C 6 D 5 CD 3 has a broad peak at δ = −76.4 ppm (full width at half-maximum (fwhm) = 692 Hz), which can be compared to the sharp resonance for AgOTf in the same solvent at −76.5 ppm (fwhm = 2.82 Hz) (Figure S4). The broad line in C 6 D 5 CD 3 is consistent with coordination of the triflate ligand to the paramagnetic iron center, although tight binding of OTf – is expected to give a larger downfield shift for the OTf – peak. , In contrast, the 1 H NMR spectrum of 2 in the presence of CD 3 CN (CD 3 CN/C 6 D 5 CD 3 (1/1 v/v) exhibits paramagnetic peaks between 0 and −50 ppm that are shifted from neat C 6 D 5 CD 3 (Figure S5). The corresponding 19 F { 1 H} NMR spectrum exhibits a much sharper peak at δ = −77.73 ppm (fwhm = 127 Hz), consistent with displacement of the OTf – axial ligand by CH 3 CN, as indicated by the UV–vis spectra in the same solvent (Figure S3).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The broad line in C 6 D 5 CD 3 is consistent with coordination of the triflate ligand to the paramagnetic iron center, although tight binding of OTf − is expected to give a larger downfield shift for the OTf − peak. 64,65 In contrast, the 1 H NMR spectrum of 2 in the presence of CD 3 CN (CD 3 CN/C 6 D 5 CD 3 (1/1 v/v) exhibits paramagnetic peaks between 0 and −50 ppm that are shifted from neat C 6 D 5 CD 3 (Figure S5). The corresponding 19 F { 1 H} NMR spectrum exhibits a much sharper peak at δ = −77.73 ppm (fwhm = 127 Hz), consistent with displacement of the OTf − axial ligand by CH 3 CN, as indicated by the UV−vis spectra in the same solvent (Figure S3).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that in the absence of TEOA, the system with Fe II ( MeHp )­Cl 2 did not induce CO 2 reduction. This indicates that a singly reduced Fe II ( MeHp )­Cl 2 , in which the added electron was localized on the MeHp ligands, i.e., Fe II ( MeHp •– )­Cl 2 , could not induce CO 2 reduction. Thus, the production of MeHp H • and its interaction with the Fe ion are essential for the CO 2 reduction.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, standard glovebox conditions are usually mandatory, which can preclude a routine use of such species in organic synthetic chemistry. Therefore, the compared stabilities of reduced complex 2 and of its neocuproine analogue 2′ utilized by Anderson were investigated after in situ generation using a Grignard reagent on one hand and after synthesis and purification on the other hand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great care must thus be taken regarding the control of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer induced by this noninnocent behavior, since it can have a dramatic impact on the stability of the complex. Recently, Anderson and co-workers systematically explored 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, more commonly referred to as neocuproine (L′ herein), as a potentially redox noninnocent ligand to iron and cobalt . Thorough characterization of the 2:1 neocuproine/metal neutral L′ 2 M (M = Co, Fe) complexes revealed them to be Fe 2+ and Co 2+ with two ligand-based radicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%