1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(87)71558-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neodymium-YAG laser photocoagulation versus multipolar electrocoagulation for the treatment of severely bleeding ulcers: a randomized comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…233 Randomized, controlled trials using multipolar electrocautery or heater probe have reported rates of perforation as high as 2%. [234][235][236][237] The rate of perforation may be higher (Յ4%) with repeat heater probe treatment when performed within 24 to 48 hours of the initial session. 238 Induction or exacerbation of bleeding is a relatively common adverse event of thermal hemostasis, occurring in as many as 5% of cases.…”
Section: Endoscopic Nonvariceal Hemostasismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…233 Randomized, controlled trials using multipolar electrocautery or heater probe have reported rates of perforation as high as 2%. [234][235][236][237] The rate of perforation may be higher (Յ4%) with repeat heater probe treatment when performed within 24 to 48 hours of the initial session. 238 Induction or exacerbation of bleeding is a relatively common adverse event of thermal hemostasis, occurring in as many as 5% of cases.…”
Section: Endoscopic Nonvariceal Hemostasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…238 Induction or exacerbation of bleeding is a relatively common adverse event of thermal hemostasis, occurring in as many as 5% of cases. 229,235,236,239 Although dual therapy with both epinephrine and a thermal modality or with 2 types of injectates is as effective as monotherapy with either a thermal technique or endoscopic clips, adverse events may be higher with dual therapy. 229,235 Endoscopic clips are the most commonly used mechanical device for endoscopic hemostasis.…”
Section: Endoscopic Nonvariceal Hemostasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, the endoscope has been successfully used for therapeutic interventional purposes in patients with GI bleeding intractable to medical management [2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, it is important to select the patients who need such procedures since in around 80% of the patients, the bleeding stops spontaneously [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While diagnostic endoscopy did not affect morbidity, mortality or the need for surgical intervention [4,5], therapeutic endoscopy, in contrast, has significantly reduced the complications of UGI bleeding [1,2,6,7]. The available and effective therapeutic modalities currently used for non-variceal UGI bleeding are: 1. thermal devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear superiority of any one of these treatment methods has not, however, been demonstrated. Goff [6] and Rutgeerts et al [7] prospectively compared patients treated for bleeding by YAG laser with those treated with bipolar coagulation and found no significant differences in rebleeding or mortality between treatment groups. Sanowski [8] reviewed endoscopic methods for treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding and showed that lasers are more costly and cumbersome for treatment of gastrointestinal hemorrhage than are other currently available systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%