2001
DOI: 10.1080/01436590120099713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberal globalisation and the triple crisis of 'modernisation' in Africa: Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Movements against the continuation of Mobutuism led to what some have described as Africa's First World War and as 'an old-fashioned war of liberation'. 9 The 1998 uprising by the Rassemblement Congolais pour la De´mocratie (RCD), supported by Rwanda and Uganda, caused Kabila to call on his Southern African neighbours, Angola, Namibia and Zimbabwe, for military support. Seven countries and 10 rebel movements were involved in the fighting.…”
Section: Background To the Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movements against the continuation of Mobutuism led to what some have described as Africa's First World War and as 'an old-fashioned war of liberation'. 9 The 1998 uprising by the Rassemblement Congolais pour la De´mocratie (RCD), supported by Rwanda and Uganda, caused Kabila to call on his Southern African neighbours, Angola, Namibia and Zimbabwe, for military support. Seven countries and 10 rebel movements were involved in the fighting.…”
Section: Background To the Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those constitutional and formal rights were received with much joy and hope, in the belief that the gross inequalities and brutalities of the past had been replaced by substantive citizenship for all. But the post-apartheid government's rapid shift from the redistributive agenda of the Reconstruction and Development Programs (RDP) to a market-driven growth agenda known as Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) has brought profound disillusionment (see Cheru 1997;Bond 2000;Moore 2001). The neoliberal development framework that was adopted relies on private-sector principles of cost recovery through users' fees: 3 basically, 'no fee, no service'.…”
Section: And the Promises Of Formal Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This neoliberal orientation (Moore, 2001;Peet, 2002), which asserts that social welfare is best advanced through 'the maximisation of entrepreneurial freedoms within an institutional framework characterised by private property rights, individual liberty, unencumbered markets and free trade' (Harvey, 2007, p. 22), led to the adoption of an increasingly market-based land reform program. Yet, claims that market-based land reform achieves optimal equity and efficiency (see for example Boudreaux, 2010) are profoundly challenged by the experience of South Africa (Lahiff, 2007;Miraftab and Wills, 2005;Hall, 2004a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%