Neoliberal urbanitet

Holsen, Terje

doi:10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2018-03-04

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A discussion about conditions for neoliberal city life is therefore closely linked to a discussion about access to urban spaces. The degree of public access is determined by access: who has rights to access, how the access is physically designed, and who controls the access of others through their own use [84]. See figure 1.…”

Section: A Model Of Inclusion and Exclusion In Public Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

Urban FM and POPS – implications for UN’s SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Holsen

Boge

2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban FM (UFM) is usually understood as micro level Facility Management (FM) methods and tools applied on macro level challenges in communities and neighbourhoods in urban areas, among others to improve the citizens’ wellbeing. UFM is also often associated with smart cities, technology, and UN’s SDGs. However, many studies of UFM overlook property rights and other institutional matters that establish many of the ground rules. Property rights are frequently understood as a bundle of rights, i.e., the right of use (USUS), the right of enjoyment (USUS FRUCTUS), and the right of disposition (ABUSUS). UFM usually takes place across property boundaries, on properties with disparate bundles of rights, including restrictions through public zoning. Many urban transformation projects have established privately owned public spaces (POPS), leading to a restructured division of responsibilities between public authorities and private owners in the management, design, access control, and use of urban public spaces. This paper investigates whether and under which conditions UFM and management of POPS can contribute to realisation of UN’s SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities, hereunder to facilitate development of inclusive, safe, robust, and sustainable cities and local communities.

show abstract

Section: A Model Of Inclusion and Exclusion In Public Spacementioning

confidence: 99%