2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberalism and Suburban Employment: Western Sydney in the 1990s

Abstract: During the past 15 years metropolitan planning strategies of the NSW state government have done little to address the spatial distribution of either employment or labour market equity within the metropolis. In the fast‐growing outer western suburbs, the government has focused on attracting business investment to increase the stock of local jobs and to improve employment ‘self‐sufficiency’— a dominantly neoliberal policy framework. This paper explores a widening gulf between the reality of outer urban change an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We briefly summarise these possible explanations here, by way of a conclusion to this article, and point to different kinds of opportunities for policy narratives, where Sydney could be re-positioned as a creative city in ways that much better appreciate the subtlety of its constituent parts. One possible explanation for the spatial trends evident in Figures 2 and 3 is that outer and exurban areas have seen absolute population and employment growth rates far exceeding inner areas (Mee, 2002;Fagan & Dowling, 2005), and creative work has simply been a part of this. This is a relatively straightforward explanation that points to the presence of creativity in all kinds of new jobs and industries, and thus, hypothesises that 'outer' and 'exurban' areas of cities, where total population and employment growth are evident, are also likely to experience growth in creative work.…”
Section: Longitudinal Analysis Of Creative Work In Sydneymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We briefly summarise these possible explanations here, by way of a conclusion to this article, and point to different kinds of opportunities for policy narratives, where Sydney could be re-positioned as a creative city in ways that much better appreciate the subtlety of its constituent parts. One possible explanation for the spatial trends evident in Figures 2 and 3 is that outer and exurban areas have seen absolute population and employment growth rates far exceeding inner areas (Mee, 2002;Fagan & Dowling, 2005), and creative work has simply been a part of this. This is a relatively straightforward explanation that points to the presence of creativity in all kinds of new jobs and industries, and thus, hypothesises that 'outer' and 'exurban' areas of cities, where total population and employment growth are evident, are also likely to experience growth in creative work.…”
Section: Longitudinal Analysis Of Creative Work In Sydneymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Contemporary patterns of economic development, housing and travel preferences do not correlate to this spatial ordering (O'Connor & Rapson, 2003;Birrel et al, 2005;Fagan & Dowling, 2005;Han, 2005). The divergence between these policy aspirations and the complex nature of urban transformations calls in to question the delivery of a sustainable urban morphology for SEQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent research on urban morphology, however, casts a sceptical view on the capacity of spatial policies to deliver neat and ordered polycentric forms (Fagan & Dowling, 2005, Williams, 2005Forster, 2006). Contemporary patterns of economic development, housing and travel preferences do not correlate to this spatial ordering (O'Connor & Rapson, 2003;Birrel et al, 2005;Fagan & Dowling, 2005;Han, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such status of the residents is in stark contrast with the fact that 150 of the nation's top 500 companies are located within GWS. Over a period of 15 years, reports (Fagan & Dowling, 2005;Mee, 2002;Murphy & Watson, 1997) consistently show that low household income and employment levels characterise the lives of a significant number of people living in GWS.…”
Section: Service Learning Unitmentioning
confidence: 94%