2013
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2012.727844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberalism and the Russian transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter point is contradicted by Peter Rutland (2013), who argues that the reforms deviated from the neo-liberal orthodoxy where it fitted the self-interest of the ruling elites. Either way, the transition ended up reinstating the traditional model of state-driven development (Robinson 2013: 28-45), while the state again performed the function of a colonising agent -perhaps even more so than under the communist rule (Etkind et al 2012: 30-1).…”
Section: Social Structure Institutions and The Statementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The latter point is contradicted by Peter Rutland (2013), who argues that the reforms deviated from the neo-liberal orthodoxy where it fitted the self-interest of the ruling elites. Either way, the transition ended up reinstating the traditional model of state-driven development (Robinson 2013: 28-45), while the state again performed the function of a colonising agent -perhaps even more so than under the communist rule (Etkind et al 2012: 30-1).…”
Section: Social Structure Institutions and The Statementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Pronounced policy dynamism is observable mainly in China, with its quest for a more sustainable trajectory, and in parts of Latin America, where left governments have combined redistributive policies with a renewed commitment to developmentalism (Grugel and Riggirozzi, ; McNally, ) . Meanwhile most countries have displayed either piecemeal efforts towards reorientation, such as Russia (Rutland, ) or, as in Turkey, a broad persistence of pre‐existing policy paths.…”
Section: From Restrictive Turbulence To Policy Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurred in the early 1990s, after the collapse of the USSR and the rapid economic liberalisation, or 'shock therapy', which followed. (Carlson and Vagero 1998;Marangos 2002Marangos , 2003Rutland 2013) Period effects are apparent in the contour maps primarily through the deeply wound concentric ovals which appear while the world wars were taking place. Different nations were exposed to this during slightly different years and to different magnitudes.…”
Section: Newer Period Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%