Neoliberalism, Authoritarian Politics and Social Policy in China

Abstract

This article explores the relationships among neoliberalism, social policy expansion and authoritarian politics in contemporary China. It argues that in the era of neoliberalism, rising new right and authoritarian governments, the Chinese Communist Party has sought to retain power by shifting politically to the right and promoting neoliberal‐looking economic policies. These policies have raised average living standards but also increased insecurity for most of the Chinese population, while new social policies have facilitated marketization. Social policy expansion includes minimal cash transfers as well as social old‐age and health insurance for hitherto excluded sections of the population. These policies have begun to erode long‐standing urban–rural segregation, but they have added new, underfunded, social programmes rather than widening participation in existing ones, re‐segregating provision so that urban elites and formal sector workers enjoy much more generous provisions than many people working informally and those without work. These social policies’ most significant dark sides thus include compounded income inequalities and the segmentation and stigmatization of the poorest. Authoritarian controls have enabled the Communist Party to avoid redistributive policies that would undermine its urban support, so that politics in China differ from the right‐wing populism of new, anti‐establishment authoritarian regimes.

‘Save the children!’: Governing left-behind children through family in China’s Great Migration

“…Second, it is also a system characterized by fragmentation and unequal access based on individuals' 'deservingness' defined by their hukou status/ type/location, the family provider(s)' employment status and job sector, and so on. According to Duckett (2020), as China deepened its pro-market economic reforms in the 1990s, which pushed a growing population into the private market, its social provision programs became ever more regressive to benefit privileged social groups such as professionals, middle management, and workers with formal labor contracts. Moreover, embedded in this neoliberal discourse of individual (and family) responsibility is a dominant ideology of 'the normal family,' which entails a child-centric and co-resident nuclear unit, performing gendered intensive parenting (i.e.…”

Challenges and Sustainability of China’s Socio-Economic Stability in the Context of Its Demographic Development

“…While pensions were provided by state-owned enterprises in the previous system, the social security system was taken over. The reform was launched at the provincial level with a view to extending it to the national level [74]. This public pension system consists of pillar 1A, a pay-as-you-go portion, and pillar 1B, a funded portion consisting of individual accounts.…”

Public Health Crises In Comparison: China’s Epidemic Response Policies From SARS To COVID-19

“…Nearly half of this spending went towards subsidising universal health insurance. In 2018, the Chinese government reported 1.34 billion people received 'basic health insurance nationwide' (Tao et al, 2020), although inequalities still exist between wealthy urban residents and migrant workers (Duckett, 2020). For example, because Chinese health insurance is tied to residency, rural-to-urban migrant workers labouring in urban areas outside of their place of insurance registration experience decreased health access (Chen et al, 2020).…”