“…But structural transformation alone offers insufficient insights and runs the risk of 'always and forever only revealing truths that are merely sociological' (Kulick 2014: 26). Rather, Comaroff (2009;2012a), for example, attends to particular cultural histories together with the broader conditions of late modernity, and the dynamism and creativity of Pentecostalism itself. That said, if one is to propose that Pentecostalism and its practices exist in a 'cheerful fellowship with the spirit of neo-liberal capitalism' (Comaroff 2009: 18), then one must ask: how is that fellowship composed in specific instances?…”