2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2023.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neolithic shepherds and sheepfold caves in Southern France and adjacent areas: An overview from 40 years of bioarchaeological analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another disadvantage is the difficulty in identifying plant sources, which are a key component of stabling deposits and may include fodder remains, digested plants within the dung pellets, bedding, and fuel. Multiproxy studies using phytoliths, pollen, calcium oxalates, ash pseudomorphs, charcoal, and other plant macroremains analyses have provided valuable information on plant sources and possible livestock diets (Allué et al, 2009; Alonso‐Eguíluz, 2012; Cabanes et al, 2009; Delhon et al, 2008; Expósito & Burjachs, 2016; Rodríguez et al, 2016; see also Delhon et al, 2023 and references therein), many of them following or combining these proxies with micromorphological analysis (Alonso‐Eguíluz et al, 2016; Burguet‐Coca et al, 2020; Euba et al, 2016; Lancelotti et al, 2014; Polo‐Díaz et al, 2016). Alternatively, micromorphology could be combined with lipid biomarker analysis, with certain types of lipids serving as proxies for plant sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage is the difficulty in identifying plant sources, which are a key component of stabling deposits and may include fodder remains, digested plants within the dung pellets, bedding, and fuel. Multiproxy studies using phytoliths, pollen, calcium oxalates, ash pseudomorphs, charcoal, and other plant macroremains analyses have provided valuable information on plant sources and possible livestock diets (Allué et al, 2009; Alonso‐Eguíluz, 2012; Cabanes et al, 2009; Delhon et al, 2008; Expósito & Burjachs, 2016; Rodríguez et al, 2016; see also Delhon et al, 2023 and references therein), many of them following or combining these proxies with micromorphological analysis (Alonso‐Eguíluz et al, 2016; Burguet‐Coca et al, 2020; Euba et al, 2016; Lancelotti et al, 2014; Polo‐Díaz et al, 2016). Alternatively, micromorphology could be combined with lipid biomarker analysis, with certain types of lipids serving as proxies for plant sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%