Neonatal Cranial Ultrasonography 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77815-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal Cranial Ultrasonography: Advantages and Aims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a limited number of brain structures have been evaluated as potential markers for brain growth or predictors for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. 18 19 20 27 28 29 It is not easy to find recognizable and consistent landmarks when exploring the brain with cUS, and this may be one of the reasons for the paucity of standardized measurable markers. The set of measurements we propose are all taken in planes routinely used during a standard scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, only a limited number of brain structures have been evaluated as potential markers for brain growth or predictors for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. 18 19 20 27 28 29 It is not easy to find recognizable and consistent landmarks when exploring the brain with cUS, and this may be one of the reasons for the paucity of standardized measurable markers. The set of measurements we propose are all taken in planes routinely used during a standard scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of measurements we propose are all taken in planes routinely used during a standard scan. 29 This means that the approach to these new measurements is easy for anyone who is able to perform standard cUS, and there is no need for further training. According to previous literature, we demonstrated a satisfactory reproducibility for CC, CCF, and TCD measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred, non-invasive tools to image the brain of infants during the neonatal period are cranial ultrasound (cUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CUS is a reliable and easily repeatable bedside tool to identify the most common preterm and some termborn brain injury types and to follow the evolution of lesions (e.g., in case of WMI, PVHI, and PHVD) [2][3][4]. However, cUS is less sensitive for assessing punctate and subtle injury (e.g., punctate white matter lesions), injury to deep and superficial structures (e.g., stroke), and alterations in brain growth and maturation (including myelination and white matter tract formation), all of which may have implications for infant neurodevelopmental outcomes [3,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%