2019
DOI: 10.5455/jpma.3145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal danger signs and healthcare seeking behaviours: A cross-sectional study in Karachi amongst pregnant females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the fact that younger mothers had lower knowledge of neonatal danger signs was also reported by another study conducted by Jemberia et al, which showed that caregivers older than 18 years old were 33% more aware of the neonatal danger signs than those younger than 18 [22]. Another study found that all women aged < 18 years had poor knowledge about neonatal danger signs [38]. In our study, 62% of mothers younger than 25 were primiparous, whom might be less experienced in caring for newborns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Similarly, the fact that younger mothers had lower knowledge of neonatal danger signs was also reported by another study conducted by Jemberia et al, which showed that caregivers older than 18 years old were 33% more aware of the neonatal danger signs than those younger than 18 [22]. Another study found that all women aged < 18 years had poor knowledge about neonatal danger signs [38]. In our study, 62% of mothers younger than 25 were primiparous, whom might be less experienced in caring for newborns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These variations might be attributed to differences in the study setting as well as socio-cultural factors. Lower results were reported from studies in Southwest Ethiopia (39%) [ 15 ], Dire Dawa Ethiopia (40.8%) [ 21 ], Northwest Ethiopia (36.5%) [ 18 ], Ethiopia (meta-analysis) (40.7%) [ 19 ], Sudan (18%) [ 31 ], Kenya (15.5%) [ 25 ], Pakistan (15%) [ 13 ], and Saudi Arabia (37%) [ 24 ]. The high literacy rate and ANC follow-up in this study, as well as greater access to health care services and television/radio, could explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, various factors that had a significant association with maternal knowledge of neonatal danger signs were also identified. Of these, age, occupation, maternal level of education, fathers' educational level, residence, availability of Radio or Television (TV), antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, spousal involvement during ANC, place of delivery, postnatal care (PNC) follow-up, higher decision-making ability, birth preparedness, information about neonatal danger signs, gravidity, previous experience of neonatal danger signs (NDSs), and counseling on newborn care are among them [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Early identification of neonatal danger signs is an important step toward improving newborn survival [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonatal danger signs are signs of serious illness that affects neonates during their neonatal period and that neonatal periods mark the rst 28 days of neonatal life. Globally, neonatal danger signs are known to be associated health complications among neonates and among these complications are decreased neonatal growth and mental development, cerebral palsy and others among the noti able cause of neonatal danger signs are neonatal jaundice, vomiting, cord sepsis, inability to suck breast milk, convulsions, hyperthermia, hypothermia, etc [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%