Which specific memory functions are dependent on the hippocampus is still debated. The availability of a large cohort of patients who had sustained relatively selective hippocampal damage early in life enabled us to determine which type of mnemonic deficit showed a correlation with extent of hippocampal injury. We assessed our patient cohort on a test that provides measures of recognition and recall that are equated for difficulty and found that the patients' performance on the recall tests correlated significantly with their hippocampal volumes, whereas their performance on the equally difficult recognition tests did not and, indeed, was largely unaffected regardless of extent of hippocampal atrophy. The results provide new evidence in favor of the view that the hippocampus is essential for recall but not for recognition.long-standing issue in memory research is the identity of the mnemonic process served by each of the components of the medial temporal lobe (MTL). Recall, which is the ability to retrieve from memory a stimulus or its context that is no longer present, is a more complex function than recognition, which is the ability to identify a current stimulus as old or new, or to choose a previously encountered stimulus among competing distractors. Over the years, a large number of studies have been conducted, aiming to tease apart the relative contribution of different MTL structures to recall and recognition. Many investigators have proposed that these two distinct memory processes rely on different MTL structures, with recall being dependent on the hippocampus and recognition being supported by parahippocampal structures, such as the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices (1-5, but see ref. 6). Also, studies examining the effects of damage to the mammillary bodies and fornices, structures within the hippocampal circuit, have shown that volume loss is correlated with deficits in recall but not in recognition (7,8).However, there is also evidence suggesting that both processes rely on the hippocampus (for a review, see ref. 6). Most of the literature on either side of this controversy is composed of studies with single cases or small sample sizes. Indeed, to date, none of the studies involving humans has been able to demonstrate a clear relationship between memory process and hippocampal volume (HV), possibly due to lack of variability in HV loss. Additionally, many of the contradictory findings could result from measures used to test recognition and recall not being equated for level of difficulty.Previous work from our group demonstrated that patients with developmental amnesia due to severe hippocampal pathology sustained early in life are seriously impaired in their ability to recall visual or verbal stimuli but are relatively unimpaired in recognizing them (9). By identifying a group of patients with varying extents of HV reduction, and applying a standardized measure of memory [the Doors and People test (D&P test) (10)] in which the recognition and recall subtests are matched for difficulty, we were abl...