ABTRACTThe transition from an intra-to extra-uterine environment leaves its mark in deciduous teeth (and first permanent molars) as an accentuated enamel incremental ring called the neonatal line (NL). This prominent microfeature separates the enamel formed during intrauterine life from that formed after leaving the womb. However, while the physical structure of this scar is well known, the bases of its formation are still a matter of investigation. In particular, besides the influence of the birth-related abrupt environmental and dietary changes and the role played by physiological factors such as hypocalcaemia, it has been suggested a direct relationship between NL thickness variation and the physical trauma implied by the birth dynamics, the Caesarean and the operative modes being apparently associated to the thinnest and the thickest lines, respectively. By using the histological record from a deciduous dental sample (exfoliated crowns) of 100 modern healthy school-aged children (47 males and 53 females) of reported birth histories (normal delivery mode: 55 cases; Caesarean: 40; operative: 5), we investigated the relationships between birth dynamics and NL thickness variation. The Tukey Honest Significant Difference method has been used to test the differences between the means of the grouping levels. The results of our histo-morphological investigation do not support the suggestion that Caesarean-born children display, on average, a thinner enamel scar compared to children associated to a normal delivery mode. Rather, our study points to the influence exerted by factors intimately related to gestational length variation on the degree of expression of the line.
KEY WORDS: HUMAN BIRTH, DELIVERY MODE, GESTATION LENGTH, DECIDUOUS TEETH, DENTAL ENAMEL STRUCTURE, INCREMENTAL MARKERS, NEONATAL LINE.Pre-print version. Visit http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/ after 1 December 2011 to acquire final version.
2The birth process leaves its mark on dental enamel in the form of a ring, an accentuated incremental line called the "Neonatal Line" (NL) (Rushton 1933;Schour 1936). This prominent microfeature, occasionally visible also in the dentine (Schour 1936;Skinner 1992), separates the enamel formed during intrauterine life from that formed after leaving the womb.In modern humans, the NL is usually present in all crowns forming at birth, that is, all the elements of the primary dentition and the first permanent molars (mesiobuccal cusp) (Christensen and Kraus 1965, Deutsch andPe'er 1982;Deutsch et al. 1985;Kraus 1959;Levine et al. 1979). Occasionally, a macroscopic hypoplasia can be detected in correspondence with the NL, but it is usually worn away (Massler et al. 1941;Moss-Salentijn and Hendricks-Klyvert 1985;Schroeder 1991;Skinner 1992).At birth, the enamel is only partially mineralized and continues to increase in thickness by apposition of additional centripetal layers secreted by the ameloblasts at the level of the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) to a circadian rhythm of 4-5 µm in extant humans (Antoine et al. 2...