2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal NR3C1 Methylation and Social-Emotional Development at 6 and 18 Months of Age

Abstract: The variation in childhood social-emotional development within at-risk populations may be attributed in part to epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation (DNAm) that respond to environmental stressors. These mechanisms may partially underlie the degree of vulnerability (and resilience) to negative social-emotional development within adverse psychosocial environments. Extensive research supports an association between maternal adversity and offspring DNAm of the NR3C1 gene, which encodes the glucocorticoid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tools have high internal consistency and acceptable sensitivity and specificity. 4 5 ASQ and ASQ-SE were validated for Turkish children earlier. 6 7 8 9…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tools have high internal consistency and acceptable sensitivity and specificity. 4 5 ASQ and ASQ-SE were validated for Turkish children earlier. 6 7 8 9…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questionnaires are well-validated, parent-completed screening tools that contain items to assess child capability of communication, gross motor, fine motor, personal-social problems, problem-solving skills, and emotional improvement by age groups. 4,5 There are different questions and tasks that are suitable for each age group from 4 months to 6 years. The questionnaires can be completed by the parents appropriately in a short time.…”
Section: Asq and Asq-sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, they noted an extreme focus on the 1F exon and emphasized the need for widening the examined sequence, in order to include all non-protein-coding first exons of the NR3C1 in the analysis [ 30 ]. Taken together, while several experimental and human studies relate maternal objective hardship as well as maternal distress in pregnancy to methylation changes of NR3C1 , there is some evidence of an association of such methylation changes with offspring psychosocial stress reactivity (e.g., [ 32 , 40 ]) and behavior (e.g., [ 41 ]) and hardly any evidence for the role of methylation changes of NR3C1 in the association between maternal distress in pregnancy and offspring behavior [ 35 ] (for a review, see Cao Lei et al [ 4 ]; Berretta et al [ 37 ]; Sosnowski et al [ 42 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To associate maternal and early adversity to infant DNAm, prior studies have employed both epigenome-wide and candidate gene approaches, with a focus on genes involved in the neuroendocrine response and neurodevelopment (2,8,9). Evidence also suggests that differences in DNAm at certain genes is associated with development and behavior (10). However, prior studies have focused primarily on individuallevel, rather than community-level adversity and the association with infant DNAm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%