2021
DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery

Abstract: Foetal acidosis is a well established predictor of neonatal outcome and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Noradrenaline, despite providing better maternal haemodynamic stability than phenylephrine during caesarean delivery, creates concerns regarding its deleterious effects on neonates. This study compares the incidence of foetal acidosis and umbilical artery base excess during prophylactic noradrenaline and phenylephrine infusion in elective caesarean section.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We appreciate the interest by Lee et al 1 in our article “Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery: A randomised clinical trial.” 2 First of all the authors raised the concern of higher dose of P as compared to N. In our study, group P received 60 μg of P as a bolus and then a continuous intravenous infusion at 100 μg min –1 . In group N, 6 μg of N was injected as a bolus, followed by infusion at 5 μg min –1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We appreciate the interest by Lee et al 1 in our article “Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery: A randomised clinical trial.” 2 First of all the authors raised the concern of higher dose of P as compared to N. In our study, group P received 60 μg of P as a bolus and then a continuous intravenous infusion at 100 μg min –1 . In group N, 6 μg of N was injected as a bolus, followed by infusion at 5 μg min –1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We appreciate the interest by Lee et al 1 in our article ''Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery: A randomised clinical trial.'' 2 First of all the authors raised the concern of higher dose of P as compared to N. In our study, group P received 60 mg of P as a bolus and then a continuous intravenous infusion at 100 mg min -1 .…”
Section: Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest the study by Singh et al 1 comparing neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of intravenous phenylephrine (P) or intravenous noradrenaline (N) in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery during spinal anaesthesia. In this double-blind randomised clinical trial, 100 full-term, non-labouring pregnant women were randomly divided into groups P and N. After cerebrospinal fluid appeared at the hub of the spinal needle during spinal anaesthesia, group P was injected with 60 μg of P intravenous as a bolus, and then started on continuous intravenous infusion of P intravenous at 100 μg min −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norepinephrine; Phenylephrine; Maternal hypotension; Caesarean delivery; Spinal anesthesia norepinephrine adversely affected fetal acid-base status less frequently [13]. Moreover, the effectiveness of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in managing maternal hypotension during cesarean sections was recently evaluated in randomized controlled trials using neonatal outcomes as the primary research indicator [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%