Neonatal risk factors and risk scores including auditory evoked responses

Pasman, J.W.; Rotteveel, J.J.; Maassen, Ben; Graaf, R.M. de; Kollée, L.A.A.

doi:10.1007/s004310050801

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients born between July 1, 1996 and June 30,1997, before the introduction of early nCPAP, represented the control group, and were used as historical controls. Patients born between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999, following the systematic introduction of early nCPAP application to treat respiratory distress, represented the nCPAP group (study group).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Short-term outcome included results of ultrasonographic examination of the brain [10,29], retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening [6] and auditory evoked responses (AER) [30]. Infants were evaluated at follow-up with a medical history, a physical examination, a standard neurological examination and developmental testing.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Adjusted p represented the p values of analyses performed again after adjusting for the variables that were statistically different between the two groups ‡ Classification of PVL, according to de Vries et al[10] § Classification of ROP, according to the International Committee for the Classification of the late Stages of Retinopathy of Prematurity[6] || Classification of AER, according to Pasman et al[30] …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Long-term outcome of preterm infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Wintermark¹,

Tolsa²,

Melle

et al. 2006

Eur J Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study's aim was to assess neurodevelopmental and growth outcome until the age of 4 years of premature infants placed on early nCPAP, in the setting of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and follow-up program of the Division of Neonatology of the Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. All consecutive inborn infants weighing <1500 g or <32 weeks of gestational age admitted to the NICU during two periods of 12 months-7.1996-6.1997 and 7.1998-6.1999-were compared before and after the systematic application of early nCPAP. Of 172 infants admitted to the NICU, 150 (87%) survived. 126 (84%) were tested at 6 months' corrected age, 121 (81%) at 18 months' corrected age, and 117 (78%) at the age of 4 years. Detailed perinatal data were collected. Follow-up included neurological examination, developmental testing and measurement of growth parameters. Statistical analyses were performed. Early application of nCPAP and avoidance of mechanical ventilation showed no adverse effects on neurodevelopment and growth. A significantly higher developmental quotient was found in the nCPAP group at 18 months' corrected age. Several trends were also noted in the nCPAP group with a decrease of intraventricular hemorrhage and in "abnormal neurodevelopment" at 6 months corrected age, a bigger head circumference at all different tested ages and a greater height at 6 and 18 months corrected ages. In conclusion, our study of developmental outcome documents the absence of any harmful effect of early application of nCPAP to treat respiratory failure in very low birthweight infants.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Long-term outcome of preterm infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Wintermark¹,

Tolsa²,

Melle

et al. 2006

Eur J Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies in the literature converge in that AEVPs are useful in maturational studies and in studies with infants showing symptoms related to lesions or dysfunction of the peripheral and/or central auditory system (Pasman, Rotteveel, Maassen, de Graaf & Visco, 1997). Furthermore, AEVPs contribute substantially to the predictive value of perinatal parameters regarding later neurological outcome, although prediction of cognitive-motor development is limited (Pasman, Rotteveel, Maassen, de Graaf, & Kollee, 1998). In the present study (Study 1) we demonstrated a high incidence of deviant AEVPs, in combination with other neurophysiological abnormalities in children with speech and language difficulties.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Clinical use of AEVP‐ and AERP‐measures in childhood speech disorders

Maassen¹,

Pasman²,

Nijland³

et al. 2006

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has long been recognized that from the first months of life auditory perception plays a crucial role in speech and language development. Only in recent years, however, is the precise mechanism of auditory development and its interaction with the acquisition of speech and language beginning to be systematically revealed. This paper presents the results of a series of studies exploring the relevance of electrophysiological measurements for the objective diagnosis of children with language and speech disorders. In the first, retrospective, study, an inventory was made of clinical neurological, neuropsychological, logopedic and neurophysiological findings obtained from 43 children referred to the Paediatric Neurology Centre for the diagnosis of their speech and language deficits. Neurophysiological abnormalities were found in 95% of these children, among these deviant auditory evoked potentials (AEVPs). The second study demonstrated developmental trends in the waveform of the cortical AEVPs up to age 6 years; the implications for longitudinal studies are discussed. Preliminary results from the third study show emerging differences in auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) for young children who are at risk for developmental dyslexia based on their family history. These findings underscore the clinical usefulness of neurophysiological measures for the diagnosis of speech-language disorders. Clinical protocols are further developed and tested.

show abstract

“…In this sense, various studies (Dorling, Field, & Manktelow, 2005;Pasman, Rotteveel, Maassen, de Graaf, & Kollée, 1998;Spittle et al, 2014;Zaramella et al, 2008) have indicated that the PERI is useful for assessing a child's risk through their subsequent development and for rapidly and reliably predicting the child's future development. The current study found a negative correlation between the PERI and the development of visual-perceptive abilities at four and five years of age, which might influence the process of learning to read, an important skill for academic performance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuropsychological assessment and perinatal risk: A study amongst very premature born 4- and 5-year old children

Sanchez-Joya

Sánchez‐Labraca

Roldan-Tapia

et al. 2017

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Prematurity and its consequences are serious problems that can result in numerous neurosensory disabilities and cerebral cognitive dysfunctions. The Perinatal Risk Index (PERI) might provide a predictive measure of these problems. Aim:This study compared the cognitive development of prematurely born children at 4 and 5 years of age with age-matched peers born at term. The secondary objective was to determine whether a correlation exists between perinatal risk and performance on neuropsychological tests among premature children.Methods: A total of 54 children between four and five years of age were evaluated; 27 were born very premature (premature group; PG), and 27 were born at term (term group; TG). Executive function, attention, memory, language, visual perception, and spatial structuring were evaluated. Subtests from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, the Rey Complex Figure Test, the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Test A, Trails A and B, the spatial structuring questionnaire from the Child Neuropsychological Maturity Questionnaire, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children were used. A PERI score was also obtained for the PG. Results:The PG showed significantly lower scores than the TG in all the studied cognitive domains. Visualperceptive scores were significantly and negatively correlated with the PERI scores of the PG. Conclusions:The PG showed neurocognitive deficits compared with the TG. The PERI can be used to predict the development of visual-perceptive abilities in children between four and five years of age.

show abstract

Neonatal risk factors and risk scores including auditory evoked responses

Cited by 11 publications

References 30 publications

Long-term outcome of preterm infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Long-term outcome of preterm infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Clinical use of AEVP‐ and AERP‐measures in childhood speech disorders

Neuropsychological assessment and perinatal risk: A study amongst very premature born 4- and 5-year old children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About