2021
DOI: 10.1159/000516031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal Withdrawal Syndrome following Late in utero Exposure to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract: <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> A clear picture of neonatal withdrawal signs due to in utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure and its consequences is still missing. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to provide an overview of neonatal withdrawal signs following late in utero exposure to SSRIs and to quantify the corresponding risks. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> MEDLINE, Web of Scienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such widespread use of SRIs during pregnancy is justified by the concerns that an untreated antenatal depression would affect early development of the offspring ( Hanley et al, 2015 ; Gentile, 2017 ; Kautzky et al, 2021 ) while the SRIs are not known to associate with major teratogenic effects other than possible cardiac issues ( Reefhuis et al, 2015 ; Wemakor et al, 2015 ; Wisner et al, 2020 ; Kolding et al, 2021 ). However, recent clinical findings have challenged the current liberal practice showing that newborn infants exposed to SRIs in utero show markedly high rates of SRI withdrawal symptoms requiring medical attention ( Ulbrich et al, 2021 ; Wang and Cosci, 2021 ). In addition, recent studies on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging ( Lugo-Candelas et al, 2018 ; Rotem-Kohavi et al, 2019 ) and cortical activity ( Videman et al, 2017 ) have suggested that SRIs may clearly have measurable effects, prompting further studies on the associated brain mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such widespread use of SRIs during pregnancy is justified by the concerns that an untreated antenatal depression would affect early development of the offspring ( Hanley et al, 2015 ; Gentile, 2017 ; Kautzky et al, 2021 ) while the SRIs are not known to associate with major teratogenic effects other than possible cardiac issues ( Reefhuis et al, 2015 ; Wemakor et al, 2015 ; Wisner et al, 2020 ; Kolding et al, 2021 ). However, recent clinical findings have challenged the current liberal practice showing that newborn infants exposed to SRIs in utero show markedly high rates of SRI withdrawal symptoms requiring medical attention ( Ulbrich et al, 2021 ; Wang and Cosci, 2021 ). In addition, recent studies on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging ( Lugo-Candelas et al, 2018 ; Rotem-Kohavi et al, 2019 ) and cortical activity ( Videman et al, 2017 ) have suggested that SRIs may clearly have measurable effects, prompting further studies on the associated brain mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to clinically prioritize disproportionality signals to provide further clarification assisting clinicians in the prescription or monitoring of antidepressant treatment in pregnant women. Venlafaxine has previously been associated with the neonatal withdrawal syndrome (Holland & Brown, 2017;Wang & Cosci, 2021), but our evidence suggests, for the first time, that mianserin, mirtazapine and trazodone may also be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…As in the total sample, the network analysis in the subset of neonates exposed to antidepressant monotherapy suggested a quartet of core symptoms including respiratory symptoms, irritability/agitation, tremor and feeding problems. There is a strong overlap between this symptom cluster and the clinical characterisation provided for SSRI-related neonatal withdrawal syndrome previously (Wang & Cosci, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1). There are concerns for psychotropic medication use during pregnancy regarding the risks of various adverse outcomes in offspring [32]. However, we did not exclude pregnant women who were on antidepressants or other psychotropic medication in view of the low exposure rates in the control groups (antidepressants: 0.67%, antipsychotics: 0.23%; antiepileptics: 0.07%; antiparkinson drugs: 0.07%; stimulants: 0.002%).…”
Section: Exposure and Comparator Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%