Glacial Sedimentary Processes and Products 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304435.ch19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoproterozoic Glaciated Basins: A Critical Review of the Snowball Earth Hypothesis by Comparison with Phanerozoic Glaciations

Abstract: The Neoproterozoic is widely considered to have experienced some of the most severe climatic perturbations recorded in Earth history, with extensive glaciations often referred to as 'Snowball Earth' events. The Snowball Earth and competing hypotheses seek to explain a wide range of geological data on Neoproterozoic pre-, syn-and post-glacial successions including glacial sedimentology, chemostratigraphy, palaeoceanography, geochronology, palaeomagnetism and palaeogeography, geodynamics, tectonics, palaeontolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
(267 reference statements)
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, opponents of the theory cite a significant number of arguments based on evidence from the rock record, against the SEH (e.g., Williams, 1975Williams, , 1986Williams, , 1998Williams, , 2004Williams, , 2008Williams et al, 2008;Young, 2004): (1) thick successions of diamictites with associated water-laid deposits; (2) evidence supporting glacial cycles and eustasy; (3) the combination of tidalites, tidal rhythmites, and thick glaciomarine successions indicates unfrozen seas over significant areas; (4) evidence for strong seasonality in glaciogenic deposits; (5) indications of gradual palaeoclimatic changes at the start and end of Proterozoic glaciogenic events rather than the rapid and extreme changes inherent in the SEH; (6) a lack of high latitude Proterozoic glacial deposits; (7) cap carbonates and BIF within the expected stratigraphic succession from SE events are not that common, and the stratigraphic position, facies and chemistry of these chemical rock types can equally be explained through alternative genetic models, especially related to rifts as supercontinents begin to break up (e.g., summary in . A recent comparison of Neoproterozoic glaciogenic units with Phanerozoic glacial deposits also provides a strong case against the SEH (Etienne et al, 2008).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, opponents of the theory cite a significant number of arguments based on evidence from the rock record, against the SEH (e.g., Williams, 1975Williams, , 1986Williams, , 1998Williams, , 2004Williams, , 2008Williams et al, 2008;Young, 2004): (1) thick successions of diamictites with associated water-laid deposits; (2) evidence supporting glacial cycles and eustasy; (3) the combination of tidalites, tidal rhythmites, and thick glaciomarine successions indicates unfrozen seas over significant areas; (4) evidence for strong seasonality in glaciogenic deposits; (5) indications of gradual palaeoclimatic changes at the start and end of Proterozoic glaciogenic events rather than the rapid and extreme changes inherent in the SEH; (6) a lack of high latitude Proterozoic glacial deposits; (7) cap carbonates and BIF within the expected stratigraphic succession from SE events are not that common, and the stratigraphic position, facies and chemistry of these chemical rock types can equally be explained through alternative genetic models, especially related to rifts as supercontinents begin to break up (e.g., summary in . A recent comparison of Neoproterozoic glaciogenic units with Phanerozoic glacial deposits also provides a strong case against the SEH (Etienne et al, 2008).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For these reasons, Andrew Knoll, when chair of the Terminal Proterozoic Subcommission, advocated a chronostratigraphic definition for the base of Cryogenian System marked by the first 'Sturtian' glacial rocks (Knoll, 2000). However, even if glacial influence could be demonstrated unambiguously in the chosen section (Etienne et al, 2008), the onset of glaciogenic deposition in one region may not correspond to a globally correlative stratigraphic horizon due to geographic variability and sub-glacial erosion (e.g. Kendall et al, 2009).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Cryogenian Period Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the supposedly snowball Earth pretext, most Neoproterozoic glacial successions compare closely in facies and stacking patterns to their Phanerozoic counterparts (Etienne et al 2007).…”
Section: Neoproterozoicmentioning
confidence: 99%