2004
DOI: 10.1002/lt.20070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoral C2 monitoring in maintenance liver transplant patients: A step forward?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data demonstrated that in stable liver transplant patients trough level monitoring frequently leads to overdosing of CYCLO, while monitoring by C‐2 may cause episodes of underdosing 15 . According to Levy and Cole the long‐term benefits of reduced toxicity caused by C‐2 monitoring might well outweigh the development of mild, easily treated rejection 32 . However, it may be better to try to avoid these rejections as well as toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our data demonstrated that in stable liver transplant patients trough level monitoring frequently leads to overdosing of CYCLO, while monitoring by C‐2 may cause episodes of underdosing 15 . According to Levy and Cole the long‐term benefits of reduced toxicity caused by C‐2 monitoring might well outweigh the development of mild, easily treated rejection 32 . However, it may be better to try to avoid these rejections as well as toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Adverse events and acute rejection episodes were similar between treatment groups. Levy et al (8) converted a series of 68 maintenance liver transplant patients from twice-daily to once-daily dosing. The mean cyclosporine C2 level on twice-daily dosing was 648 ng/mL and after conversion to once-daily dosing with dose adjustment was 748 ng/mL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%