2012
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2012.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neotropical Spotted Cat Species Discrimination Using Morphometrics

Abstract: Leopardus cat species identification can be performed using footprints. We performed a discriminant function analysis on a data set of 52 Neotropical Spotted Cats (NSC) individuals from a Brazilian wildlife reserve. We isolated five morphometrics that wildlife biologists can use to identify the author of a track or footprint, i.e. total length, heel pad width, negative space (Lead toe to the front lobe of heel pad length), outer toe area and heel pad area. Our technique properly classified 94.2% of the individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wildlife biologists using only footprints to confirm species presence in such environments should be aware of this bias and adapt their sampling strategy to minimize it (e.g., use multiple monitoring approaches). Although Bertrand and Morisot [54] used five measurements to differentiate ocelot, oncilla and margay, the authors did not describe the percentage of identification success among species, reporting only the general percentage for all species combined; their results seem to show a clear separation only between small (oncilla and margay) and medium cats (ocelot) (see Fig. 3 in [54]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wildlife biologists using only footprints to confirm species presence in such environments should be aware of this bias and adapt their sampling strategy to minimize it (e.g., use multiple monitoring approaches). Although Bertrand and Morisot [54] used five measurements to differentiate ocelot, oncilla and margay, the authors did not describe the percentage of identification success among species, reporting only the general percentage for all species combined; their results seem to show a clear separation only between small (oncilla and margay) and medium cats (ocelot) (see Fig. 3 in [54]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Bertrand and Morisot [54] used five measurements to differentiate ocelot, oncilla and margay, the authors did not describe the percentage of identification success among species, reporting only the general percentage for all species combined; their results seem to show a clear separation only between small (oncilla and margay) and medium cats (ocelot) (see Fig. 3 in [54]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%