2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neovaginal Prolapse Treated with Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, there has been few surgeries described for neovaginal prolapse in women with MRKH syndrome in the literature 3–11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Until now, there has been few surgeries described for neovaginal prolapse in women with MRKH syndrome in the literature 3–11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Zhu et al ., had performed iliococcygeal fascia fixation for the treatment of sigmoid neovagen prolapse with an MRKH syndrome patient 8 . Recently, Hao et al ., preferred to treat the sigmoid neovagen prolapse with a patient with MRKH syndrome by sacrospinous ligament suspension instead of neither iliococcygeal fascia fixation nor sacrocolpopexy 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the cases found in our literature review, mucosal resection was always combined with some other surgical procedure in order to achieve a sufficient suspension. 6,9,14 Finally, in our third attempt an interdisciplinary approach was necessary which addressed primarily the length of the neovagina. The shortening of the apical part in combination with the suspension with a non-absorbable mesh was the successful approach to correct the recurrent prolapse.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Due to the low number of affected women treated with a sigmoid vagina the incidence of consecutively reported neovaginal prolapse is low. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Djordjevic et al 2 reported in their series a prolapse rate of 8.1%. In total some data indicate that the incidence of a neovaginal prolapse is approximately 2.3%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%