1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00292867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nephrotoxicity of cis-diamminedichloride platinum (CDDP) during remission-induction and maintenance chemotherapy of testicular carcinoma

Abstract: We studied renal function in nine patients with disseminated testicular carcinoma before and after remission-induction and maintenance therapy with a drug combination containing cis-platinum. The median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased during remission-induction therapy from 146 to 118 ml/min. No effect of cumulative toxicity on the median GFR was found during maintenance therapy, nor did the median GFR improve. The median effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) decreased during the total period from 705 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our present study, a significant increase in serum creatinine level was not observed (data not shown). Groth et al [8] and Meijer et al [9] reported that the scrum creatinine level was a less suitable parameter for monitoring renal side effects of cisplatin than C<> Therefore, renal function was evaluated by Co-in the present study. Our results demonstrated that neither the cumulative dose of cispla tin nor accumulated Pt in the kidney affected renal func tion, as far as Co-was utilized to assess renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our present study, a significant increase in serum creatinine level was not observed (data not shown). Groth et al [8] and Meijer et al [9] reported that the scrum creatinine level was a less suitable parameter for monitoring renal side effects of cisplatin than C<> Therefore, renal function was evaluated by Co-in the present study. Our results demonstrated that neither the cumulative dose of cispla tin nor accumulated Pt in the kidney affected renal func tion, as far as Co-was utilized to assess renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have reported cumulative and unpredictable nephrotoxicity (Goren et al, 1986) while others have related cumulative toxicity to renal cortical platinum concentrations (Stewart et al, 1985). Others have denied any cumulative toxicity (Meijer et al, 1982;Chiuten et al, 1983) (Daugaard et al, 1988), in the stable pretreatment or long post-treatment situation an excellent correlation between serum creatinine and GFR is seen (Daugaard et al, 1988) and indeed some have suggested that serum creatinine is the preferred measure of GFR (Payne, 1986). The rise in serum creatinine in this population is thus considered to be due to renal damage which is largely determined by the cummulative dose of cisplatin.…”
Section: Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of these methods is that they measure only GFR. Previous studies with cisplatin have shown a decrease in GFR and ERPF after treatment [18,19,21]. Also, an increase in FF has been observed, implying that ERPF decreases more than GFR [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%