Nerve excitation using an amplitude-modulated signal with kilohertz-frequency carrier and non-zero offset

Abstract

BackgroundIncorporating kilohertz-frequency signals in transcutaneous electrical stimulation has been proposed as a means to overcome the impedance of the skin, thereby reaching deeper nerves. In particular, a transdermal amplitude modulated signal (TAMS), composed of a 210 kHz non-zero offset carrier modulated by rectangular pulses, was introduced recently for the treatment of overactive bladder. However, the contribution of the components of TAMS to nerve fiber activation has not been quantified.MethodsWe conducted in vivo experiments and applied direct stimulation to the sciatic nerve of cats and rats. We measured electromyogram and compound action potential activity evoked by pulses, TAMS and modified versions of TAMS in which we varied the size of the carrier.ResultsNerve fiber activation using TAMS showed no difference with respect to activation with conventional pulse for carrier frequencies of 20 kHz and higher, regardless the relative amplitude of the carrier. For frequencies lower than 20 kHz, the offset needed to generate half of the maximal evoked response decreased significantly with respect to the pulse. Results of simulations in a computational model of nerve fiber stimulation using the same stimulation waveforms closely matched our experimental measurements.ConclusionTaken together, these results suggest that a TAMS with carrier frequencies >20 kHz does not offer any advantage over conventional pulses, even with larger amplitudes of the carrier, and this has implications for design of waveforms for efficient and effective transcutaneous stimulation.

A Simulation Study on Selective Stimulation of C-Fiber Nerves for Chronic Pain Relief

“…5), indicating that a high-frequency carrier (>10 kHz) has no further contribution to myelinated or unmyelinated nerve fibers simulated by the MRG and HH model, respectively. This finding partially agrees with Grill et al's results regarding the fact that a high-frequency carrier (>2 kHz) does not further contribute to the activation of myelinated fibers [59]. However, for the HH model, when simulating unmyelinated sensory nerves, there have not been any reports on their responses to high-frequency carriers to the best of our knowledge.…”

Burst‐modulated wide‐pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation enhances H‐reflex recruitment in rats

“…Recent studies showed that NMES with burst‐modulated waveforms requires less charge to evoke a response activating 50% of the vagal nerve fiber group . Medina and Grill employed sinusoidal carrier pulses to stimulate the sciatic nerve. The required current amplitude for 50% nerve fiber activation was reduced for stimulus with a sinusoidal burst when the corresponding carrier frequency was under 20 kHz.…”

An Efficient Noninvasive Neuromodulation Modality for Overactive Bladder Using Time Interfering Current Method

“…Applying high-frequency signals that differ only by a slight frequency level (e.g., 1 = 2 kHz, 2 = 2.01 kHz), a low-frequency beat envelope ( Δ = 1 − 2 = 10 Hz ) is created by current interference. If the beat frequency is sufficiently low for neurons to respond, interfering currents can then evoke the nervous system as pure low-frequency stimulation [21,22]. The high-frequency ICT carrier facilitates penetration, and its low-frequency envelope facilitates substantial nerve stimulation.…”