2006
DOI: 10.1676/04-100.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nest-Site Selection and Productivity of American Dippers in the Oregon Coast Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these characteristics coincide with the shape, substrate and material for nests described for other species of dippers (Cinclus sp.) (Smiddy et al 1995;Loegering and Anthony 2006). Nests found in this study had two defined structural zones: a dome and a cup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, these characteristics coincide with the shape, substrate and material for nests described for other species of dippers (Cinclus sp.) (Smiddy et al 1995;Loegering and Anthony 2006). Nests found in this study had two defined structural zones: a dome and a cup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Nests located at higher heights might suggest the need for greater protection from natural (e.g., river floods, predators) or anthropogenic (e.g., tourism) disturbances. However, we did not test this hypothesis, and other explanations also might be plausible and need to be tested (e.g., availability of nesting sites at greater heights above water) (Del Guasta 2003;Loegering and Anthony 2006). Nests in Caspala occur at a distance of 600 m (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, altitudinal migration in American Dippers has been argued to be an outcome of intraspecific competition for limited nesting sites at low elevations that forces the majority of individuals to either move to higher elevations to breed or forgo reproduction (Gillis et al 2008). (Loegering and Anthony 2006), residents have consistently higher annual productivity than migrants, and are predicted to have higher lifetime reproductive success (Gillis et al 2008). 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%