2006
DOI: 10.3161/068.041.0108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nest sites of Great Spotted WoodpeckersDendrocopos majorand Middle Spotted WoodpeckersDendrocopos mediusin Near-Natural and Managed Riverine Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2004, the whole study plot (222.6 ha) was established as a nature reserve named Czeszewski Las. More detailed information about the nesting habitats of woodpeckers is presented elsewhere (Kosinski & Winiecki 2004, Kosinski et al 2006.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, the whole study plot (222.6 ha) was established as a nature reserve named Czeszewski Las. More detailed information about the nesting habitats of woodpeckers is presented elsewhere (Kosinski & Winiecki 2004, Kosinski et al 2006.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the effects deteriorating the parkland habitat structure as compared with the woodland seem to be analogous but more pronounced than in the case of managed vs. natural forests (e.g. Wesołowski et al 2005, Kosiński et al 2006. Hence, we initially assumed that the differences in the structure of the two habitats studied would influence trophic conditions for breeding birds (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the trees used by ERNs were ~20 cm smaller in trunk diameter than trees inhabited by the Eurasian Nuthatch (based on tree trunk measurements at the height of 65 cm reported in Wesołowski & Rowiński 2004). Even though each species has different habitat requirements, these data suggest that nuthatches (like woodpeckers) also selected nest locations high in tree stands that have trees with thicker trunks as well as greater heights (Wesołowski & Rowiński 2004, Kosiński et al 2006, Michalczuk & Michalczuk 2016. We, therefore, assume that in our study area, the ERN was able to inhabit only lower-placed tree nests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%