2010
DOI: 10.2174/1876325101004010063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nest Survival of Understory Birds in Longleaf Pine Forests Exposed to Fire and Fire-Surrogate Treatments

Abstract: Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forest ecosystems evolved with short-interval, low intensity fires. Fire suppression has reduced or eliminated fire and has caused extensive changes in plant community composition and structure. The National Fire and Fire-Surrogate study was implemented to evaluate effects of alternative habitat treatments, such as herbicide application and mechanical thinning, and to compare them with effects of prescribed fire. We evaluated how treatments influenced the nesting success of bird… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available data suggests that the species experiences moderate to low nest survival in many locations studied to date, but is very tolerant of habitat disturbance [38]. In the Gulf Coastal Plain study site, which had the largest sample sizes of nests, cardinal nest survival was variable and not clearly associated with treatments [39].…”
Section: Shrub Nestersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Available data suggests that the species experiences moderate to low nest survival in many locations studied to date, but is very tolerant of habitat disturbance [38]. In the Gulf Coastal Plain study site, which had the largest sample sizes of nests, cardinal nest survival was variable and not clearly associated with treatments [39].…”
Section: Shrub Nestersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is particularly an issue when studying naturally rare species (often the species of most management interest) and studying ecosystems with relatively low productivity and therefore, lower abundances of most species. Robinson and Rompré [2], for example, estimated from studies of 10 to 12-ha plots in longleaf pine forest, a habitat supporting comparatively low numbers of birds overall [3], that a minimum plot size of 100 ha would have been required to conduct strong statistical comparisons of nest survival for just the most common species. The entire study of that longleaf community included 150 ha distributed across 15 plots, so enlarging plots by an order of magnitude would have also enlarged costs of setting up, manipulating, and maintaining the plots by at least that same amount.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, even when nest survival was quite high, as in the South Carolina study site [9], sample sizes were low because few nesting attempts were made by the individuals breeding in those plots. In plots of longleaf pine in southern Alabama, the overall population densities of songbirds were so low that it was nearly impossible to find large samples of nests, even for the most common species and even when predation rates were high, leading to multiple re-nesting attempts [2]. The strategy of those studies was to present their findings, including the raw data on nest exposure days, so that data are available for future meta-analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%