2015
DOI: 10.1002/art.39059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested Case–Control Study of Selected Systemic Autoimmune Diseases in World Trade Center Rescue/Recovery Workers

Abstract: Objective To test the a priori hypothesis that acute and chronic work exposures to the World Trade Center (WTC) site on or after September 11, 2001 were associated with risk of new-onset systemic autoimmune diseases. Methods A nested case–control study was performed in WTC rescue/recovery workers who had received a rheumatologist-confirmed systemic auto-immune disease diagnosis between September 12, 2001 and September 11, 2013 (n = 59), each of whom was individually matched to 4 randomly selected controls (n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Projecting the deficit in cases observed in the lower exposure group, in which FDNY cases reached 83% of expectation, we would have anticipated 18.5 SAID cases among the higher exposure group, which is 11.5 cases fewer than were observed. This result of excess cases in the higher exposure group is supported by our recent case-control study 35 which, using different methodology, found similar results. In that study, prolonged work exposure conferred a 13% increased risk for each month at the WTC site compared with risk in those who worked only 1 month, and early arrival at the WTC site during the morning of 9/11 conferred an additional independent risk (conditional odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.86–3.89).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Projecting the deficit in cases observed in the lower exposure group, in which FDNY cases reached 83% of expectation, we would have anticipated 18.5 SAID cases among the higher exposure group, which is 11.5 cases fewer than were observed. This result of excess cases in the higher exposure group is supported by our recent case-control study 35 which, using different methodology, found similar results. In that study, prolonged work exposure conferred a 13% increased risk for each month at the WTC site compared with risk in those who worked only 1 month, and early arrival at the WTC site during the morning of 9/11 conferred an additional independent risk (conditional odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.86–3.89).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This pathophysiologic process may explain the autoimmune phenomenon observed in our study in which almost half of those subjects with HP who did not meet our HPAF criteria had either a positive ANA or CTD symptoms. Perhaps like cigarette smokers (25, 26) and coal workers who develop RA (27) , silica-exposed individuals who develop RA and SLE (28-31) , farmers at increased risk of primary systemic vasculitis (32) and the World Trade Center firefighters/rescue workers who developed diverse CTDs (33) , inhaled environmental exposures may trigger autoimmune processes in genetically susceptible individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, immunity plays a critical role in the development of HPV-associated cancers in particular. It has recently also become evident that WTC exposure is associated with autoimmune disease and possible immune dysregulation [16]. As a result, it is possible that systemic immune effects of WTC exposure may synergize with HPV mediated carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently also become evident that WTC exposure is associated with autoimmune disease and possible immune dysregulation. 16 As a result, it is possible that systemic immune effects of WTC exposure may synergize with HPV mediated carcinogenesis. Additionally, altered immunity and rheumatological disease have been linked to an inferior response to chemoradiation therapy for HPV1 OPC.…”
Section: Cancer Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%