2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1299-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nestmate recognition in social insects is sometimes more complex than an individual based decision to accept or reject

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, even though rejection of non-nestmates was greater over 3min compared with the initial contact, it remains ineffectual. Previous modelling work has predicted that, inside the hive, near-perfect recognition could be achieved through the collective process of multiple contacts between an introduced bee and that colony's worker bees (Johnson et al, 2011;Johnson et al, 2012). The model suggested that even if per-encounter (initial) rejection rate of a non-nestmate is 20%, then after just 21 encounters, the overall probability of acceptance of the nonnestmate should be <1% (Johnson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, even though rejection of non-nestmates was greater over 3min compared with the initial contact, it remains ineffectual. Previous modelling work has predicted that, inside the hive, near-perfect recognition could be achieved through the collective process of multiple contacts between an introduced bee and that colony's worker bees (Johnson et al, 2011;Johnson et al, 2012). The model suggested that even if per-encounter (initial) rejection rate of a non-nestmate is 20%, then after just 21 encounters, the overall probability of acceptance of the nonnestmate should be <1% (Johnson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%