2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01334.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nestsite selection by male loons leads to sex‐biased site familiarity

Abstract: Summary 1.The concept that animals benefit from gaining familiarity with physical spaces is widespread among ecologists and constitutes a theoretical pillar in studies of territory defence, philopatry and habitat selection. Yet proximate causes and fitness benefits of site familiarity are poorly known. 2. We used data from marked common loons Gavia immer breeding on 98 territories over 14 years to investigate the 'win-stay, lose-switch rule' for nestsite placement (if eggs hatch, reuse nestsite; if predator ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nesting site fidelity occurs in a variety of extant vertebrates (Harris et al, 1996;Madsen and Shine, 1999;Wilson et al, 1999;Webster and Cook, 2001;Nordmoe et al, 2004) where nest space is limited by the availability of suitable substrates or shade, protection from predators, parasite density, and flooding frequency (Badyaev and Faust, 1996;Stanback and Dervan, 2001). Site fidelity is associated with and provides an important benefit to reproductive success, particularly with intraspecific competition over limited nesting resources (Badyaev and Faust, 1996;Harris et al, 1996;Madsen *Corresponding author. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e932797 (9 pages) Ó by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2014.932797 and Shine, 1999Semel and Sherman, 2001;Stanback and Dervan, 2001;Kruchenberg and Borbach-Jaene, 2004;Schmidt, 2004;Piper et al, 2008).…”
Section: Review Of Dinosaur Site Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesting site fidelity occurs in a variety of extant vertebrates (Harris et al, 1996;Madsen and Shine, 1999;Wilson et al, 1999;Webster and Cook, 2001;Nordmoe et al, 2004) where nest space is limited by the availability of suitable substrates or shade, protection from predators, parasite density, and flooding frequency (Badyaev and Faust, 1996;Stanback and Dervan, 2001). Site fidelity is associated with and provides an important benefit to reproductive success, particularly with intraspecific competition over limited nesting resources (Badyaev and Faust, 1996;Harris et al, 1996;Madsen *Corresponding author. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e932797 (9 pages) Ó by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2014.932797 and Shine, 1999Semel and Sherman, 2001;Stanback and Dervan, 2001;Kruchenberg and Borbach-Jaene, 2004;Schmidt, 2004;Piper et al, 2008).…”
Section: Review Of Dinosaur Site Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests individuals use their experiences to assess breeding site quality (Schmidt, ). A simple decision rule that is widely supported across animal taxa (especially birds; Piper, Walcott, Mager, & Spilker, ) is that of the win‐stay:lose‐switch (WSLS) rule (Schmidt, ): individuals return to a breeding site if they successfully produce young or switch breeding sites if they are unsuccessful. The type of information used in this decision is known as “private information” (Schmidt et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ungulates, however, are a taxonomic group where individuals should also benefit from site familiarity. Many ungulate species show high fidelity to seasonal home ranges (Edge et al 1985;Purdue et al 2000;Wittmer et al 2006) and are long-lived, both important traits for spatial learning (Piper et al 2008;Spencer 2012). Ungulates also utilize spatial knowledge at several spatial scales, showing plasticity in home range size and seasonal movements .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%