2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01363.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Net ecosystem productivity of boreal jack pine stands regenerating from clearcutting under current and future climates

Abstract: Life cycle analysis of climate and disturbance effects on forest net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is necessary to assess changes in forest carbon (C) stocks under current or future climates. Ecosystem models used in such assessments need to undergo well-constrained tests of their hypotheses for climate and disturbance effects on the processes that determine CO 2 exchange between forests and the atmosphere. We tested the ability of the model ecosys to simulate diurnal changes in CO 2 fluxes under changing air t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, temperature-induced increased rates of evapotranspiration and tree respiration [25] during the growing season may divert some of the photosynthate away from the production of new plant tissue. Inferences derived from physiological-based tree models have reported adverse climate change effects on jack pine arising from hydraulic limitations generated from temperature-induced vapour pressure deficits [26]. Similar site-specific effects were reported by Loustau et al [27] who found that climate effects on the productivity of forests in western Europe were greatest on the higher fertility sites.…”
Section: Productivity Responses By Site Quality Locale Emission Scementioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, temperature-induced increased rates of evapotranspiration and tree respiration [25] during the growing season may divert some of the photosynthate away from the production of new plant tissue. Inferences derived from physiological-based tree models have reported adverse climate change effects on jack pine arising from hydraulic limitations generated from temperature-induced vapour pressure deficits [26]. Similar site-specific effects were reported by Loustau et al [27] who found that climate effects on the productivity of forests in western Europe were greatest on the higher fertility sites.…”
Section: Productivity Responses By Site Quality Locale Emission Scementioning
confidence: 58%
“…These include the increased occurrence and severity of biotic (e.g., insect and disease [37]) and abiotic (e.g., wildfire [38]) impacts, increased rates of decomposition, unknown interactions between hydrological and biochemical cycles, and the CO 2 fertilization effect (e.g., [39]). Given the unknown impact of these effects on forest productivity and limitations of the statistical quasi-causal modeling approach [26], caution must be exercised when interpreting the predicted consequences of climate change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies suggested that the most important processes to explain increases in DOC after forest harvesting was the rise in organic matter leaching from logging slash; the increase decomposition of organic logging residues and organic matter in the surface soils due to increased forest floor temperature and moisture; and a reduction in evapotranspiration causing an increase in runoff quantity leading to a higher water table favorable to the exportation of DOM from the surface and riparian soils (Qualls et al, 2000;Bishop et al, 2004;Kreutzweiser et al, 2008;Schelker et al, 2013b). However, the largest Cefflux from a forest floor is soil respiration, which has been shown to change as a result of forest disturbance (Grant et al, 2007). Leaching from logging slash or foliage and woody debris mixed to surface soils after forest harvesting could enrich water soil surface in organic components (Qualls et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, patterns of inter-biome [15,18,25,26] or inter-annual [19,27,28] exchange of CO 2 between forest ecosystems and the atmosphere are not clear. Considerable uncertainties remain regarding C sink dynamics during forest succession [29,30] . Here, we synthesized published EC CO 2 flux measurements at various forest sites in the global network of eddy flux tower sites (FLUXNET) and regional flux networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%