2016
DOI: 10.1515/boku-2016-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Net food production of different livestock: A national analysis for Austria including relative occupation of different land categories / Netto-Lebensmittelproduktion der Nutztierhaltung: Eine nationale Analyse für Österreich inklusive relativer Flächenbeanspruchung

Abstract: Summary The discussion on the role of livestock in human food security is often controversial. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the net contribution of different livestock to human food protein and energy supply. Furthermore, the proportions of feed protein and feed energy derived from different land categories were estimated. National data from 2011–2013 for the main Austrian livestock categories (cattle, dairy cows, growing-fattening bulls, swine, broiler chickens, laying hens, turkeys, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model, we include production parameters consistent with common beef cattle practices combined with the systems approach of Peters et al (2014) . In addition, we use methodology presented by Wilkinson (2011) and Ertl et al (2015b , 2016a , 2016b ) to estimate the NPC to the human food supply from various beef cattle production scenarios in the United States.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our model, we include production parameters consistent with common beef cattle practices combined with the systems approach of Peters et al (2014) . In addition, we use methodology presented by Wilkinson (2011) and Ertl et al (2015b , 2016a , 2016b ) to estimate the NPC to the human food supply from various beef cattle production scenarios in the United States.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intakes of all classes of beef cattle represented in the model system were estimated using equations from NASEM (2016) . Feedstuffs with nutrient compositions presented by NASEM (2016) were classified as edible, partially edible, or inedible using criteria according to Wilkinson (2011) and Ertl et al (2016b ; Table 1 ). Calculations of HeP f were conducted according to Ertl et al (2016b) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the limited capacity to digest fibrous (human-inedible) feeds, monogastric animals consume high proportions of feedstuffs (e.g. soy products) that directly compete with human food (Ertl et al, 2016). The replacement of human-edible feeds by human-inedible feeds greatly contributes to more sustainable livestock systems (Schader et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production parameters were consistent with common beef cattle practices combined with the systems approach of Peters et al (2014). Additionally, we used methodology presented by Wilkinson (2011), Ertl et al (2015Ertl et al ( , 2016a, and Baber et al (2018) to estimate the NPC to the human food supply from various beef cattle production scenarios in the United States. Humanedible protein conversion efficiency, digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS), protein quality ratio (PQR), and NPC were estimated for each sector and the entire system according to methods described in Baber et al (2018).…”
Section: Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%