2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15399-0_56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NetPot: Easy Meal Enjoyment for Distant Diners

Abstract: Abstract. We capture key factors of a group meal with communication and interface technologies to make a meal more enjoyable for diners who cannot be collocated. We determined three factors of a popular group meal, Chinese hotpot, that are essential for a group meal experience: interacting as a group with food, a central shared hotpot, and a feeling that others are nearby. We developed a prototype system to maintain these factors for an online meal with remote friends. Our technique is of interest to designers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; see Narumi et al, 2012; Spence and Piqueras-Fiszman, 2013, 2014; Spence et al, 2016; Spence, 2017c]. We will not, however, be focusing on the role of digital technology in helping people to connect, or share, in the act of preparing/making food (e.g., Bell and Kaye, 2002; Mäkelä, 2009; Foley-Fisher et al, 2010). One might think here only about the phenomenal rise of digital cooking assistants such as Chef Steps 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; see Narumi et al, 2012; Spence and Piqueras-Fiszman, 2013, 2014; Spence et al, 2016; Spence, 2017c]. We will not, however, be focusing on the role of digital technology in helping people to connect, or share, in the act of preparing/making food (e.g., Bell and Kaye, 2002; Mäkelä, 2009; Foley-Fisher et al, 2010). One might think here only about the phenomenal rise of digital cooking assistants such as Chef Steps 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could again be due to the fact that the research focus of the authors was less on the development of a holistic, interactive tabletop system or device, but rather on the innovation of a technical aspect. Nevertheless, five papers [6,12,14,45,46] mentioned explorative research into the practices, rituals, values, and meanings embedded in the scenarios chosen. Only three of the 22 papers [10,15,16] started the design process started with an ethnographic investigation to provide an overview of possible scenarios and practices in homes.…”
Section: Design Choices: Use Cases and Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the RemoTable aims for a neutral aesthetic, which has proven useful in the lab but not yet in the wild. In fact, most projects from our set of relevant papers were evaluated in a technical proofof-concept state [3,14,24,32,33,35,42,43,49]. In this context, only four papers contribute to the interplay between interactive tables and a preferable interaction that fits the demands of a group of people at a table [5,16,44,45].…”
Section: Design Choices: the Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using stereoscopic AR interfaces, other studies have investigated altering the luminance distribution of a slice of cake (Ueda et al, 2020) and changing the apparent size of a cookie (Narumi et al, 2012). Furthermore, projective AR systems have been used to modify the food color of sponge cake and potato crisps in real time (Nishizawa et al, 2016) and modify the appearance of the cooking state of food in a Chinese hotpot with remote commensals (Foley-Fisher et al, 2010).…”
Section: Impossible Xr Eating Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%