2018
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.11079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network analysis as a method of assessing terms in a dataset comprising eating disorders

Abstract: Eating disorders are central reason of physical and psycho-social morbidity. Several factors have been identified as being associated with the prevalence and progression of eating disorders in humans. Scientific investigation was carried out to assess the usage of terms in manuscript titles of nearly 900 published articles followed by network analysis and network centralities using R programming. The tm package, term document matrix function was utilized to create a term document matrix (TDM) from the corpus. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous bibliometric studies about ED have focused on: identifying the distribution by language, region and country, as well as topics and their trends [1], productivity trends and collaboration patterns [2], most cited works in Anorexia Nervosa research [8], cross-cultural aspects of ED [3], comparison of citations between types of journals [9], female authorship [10], secular trends in the scientific terminology [11,12], the gap between scientific research and clinical practice [13], the use of keywords [14], and network analyses of common terms used in the field [15]. In particular, the current study complements the work by He et al [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous bibliometric studies about ED have focused on: identifying the distribution by language, region and country, as well as topics and their trends [1], productivity trends and collaboration patterns [2], most cited works in Anorexia Nervosa research [8], cross-cultural aspects of ED [3], comparison of citations between types of journals [9], female authorship [10], secular trends in the scientific terminology [11,12], the gap between scientific research and clinical practice [13], the use of keywords [14], and network analyses of common terms used in the field [15]. In particular, the current study complements the work by He et al [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%