1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01410780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network analysis as a method for the evaluation of service delivery systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the low end, only six of the 49 articles (12%) coded as community mental health centers and services explicitly referred to guiding theories. Theoretical frameworks in this category included person–environment fit (Moos, ) and systems theory (Burgess, Nelson & Wallhaus, ). Commonly referenced theories in the stigma category included attribution theory (Corrigan et al., ) and the contact hypothesis (Allport, ), while expressed emotion (Brown, Birley & Wing, ) and the buffering hypothesis (Bell, Leroy & Stephenson, ) were commonly cited in the family and caregiver category.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the low end, only six of the 49 articles (12%) coded as community mental health centers and services explicitly referred to guiding theories. Theoretical frameworks in this category included person–environment fit (Moos, ) and systems theory (Burgess, Nelson & Wallhaus, ). Commonly referenced theories in the stigma category included attribution theory (Corrigan et al., ) and the contact hypothesis (Allport, ), while expressed emotion (Brown, Birley & Wing, ) and the buffering hypothesis (Bell, Leroy & Stephenson, ) were commonly cited in the family and caregiver category.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have used LST as a framework for modeling, analysis, and/or evaluation of community mental health activities and health delivery systems (Baker & O'Brien, 1971;Bolman, 1967;Burgess, Nelson, & Wallhaus, 1974;Newbrough, 1972;Pierce, 1972 ). LST has also provided a theoretical basis for assessing program effectiveness in community life (Weiss & Rein, 1970).…”
Section: Application and Validation Oj Lstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables X6-X1z are the result of network analysis, an important theoretical and research tool used to investigate systematically the individual's total social field (Burgess, Nelson, & Wallhaus, 1974;Hammer et al, 1978;Mitchell & Trickett, 1980). The primary focus of research on schizophrenics' networks has been the comparison of their structural characteristics with those of different populations, with the most consistent finding being that schizophrenics have smaller networks than other groups (Cohen & Sokolovsky, 1978;Hammer, 1963-64; Lipton et al, 1981;Pattison, Defrancisco, Wood, Frazier, & Crowder, 1975;Tolsdorf, 1976).…”
Section: The Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the role that environmental and personal determinants may play in network development (Henderson, Duncan-Jones, McAuley, & Ritchie, 1978;Mitchell & Trickett, 1980), our objective was to examine the influence of patient and facility characteristics on the size and diversity of personal network ties both within and outside the residential facility and on contact with community support systems. Natural or community support systems consisting of social organizations and mutual benefit associations constitute a dimension of the schizophrenic's social field that is often neglected but which provides important structural resources and a sense of belonging (Bachrach, 1982; Burgess et al, 1974;Turner & TenHoor, 1978).…”
Section: Length Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%