Control of multiple life-critical physiological and behavioral functions requires the hypothalamus. Here, we provide a comprehensive description and rigorous analysis of mammalian intrahypothalamic network architecture. To achieve this at the gray matter region (macroscale) level, macroscale connection (macroconnection) data for the rat hypothalamus were extracted from the primary literature. The dataset indicated the existence of 7,982 (of 16,770 possible) intrahypothalamic macroconnections. Network analysis revealed that the intrahypothalamic macroconnection network (its macroscale subconnectome) is divided into two identical top-level subsystems (or subnetworks), each composed of two nested second-level subsystems. At the top-level, this suggests a deeply integrated network; however, regional grouping of the two second-level subsystems suggested a partial separation between control of physiological functions and behavioral functions. Furthermore, inclusion of four candidate hubs (dominant network nodes) in the second-level subsystem that is associated prominently with physiological control suggests network primacy with respect to this function. In addition, comparison of network analysis with expression of gene markers associated with inhibitory (GAD65) and excitatory (VGLUT2) neurotransmission revealed a significant positive correlation between measures of network centrality (dominance) and the inhibitory marker. We discuss these results in relation to previous understandings of hypothalamic organization and provide, and selectively interrogate, an updated hypothalamus structure-function network model to encourage future hypothesis-driven investigations of identified hypothalamic subsystems.
SignificanceControl of multiple life-critical physiological and fundamental behavioral functions requires the hypothalamus. Here, we provide a comprehensive description and analysis of mammalian intrahypothalamic network organization at the level of gray matter regions (macroscale). Network analysis revealed deep top-level network integration, but regional organization of two secondlevel subsystems (or subnetworks) indicated partial separation between control of physiological functions and behavioral functions; furthermore, inclusion of dominant network nodes in the subnetwork associated prominently with physiological functions suggests network primacy for physiological control. Comparing network organization to inhibitory (GAD65) and excitatory (VGLUT2) neurotransmission-associated gene markers revealed a significant positive correlation between network centrality (dominance) and the inhibitory marker. We introduce a novel intrahypothalamic network model to guide future hypothesis-driven investigations into hypothalamic structure and function.