2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network centrality and delegated investment performance

Abstract: We document a positive relation between network centrality and risk-adjusted performance in a delegated investment management setting. More connected managers take more portfolio risk and receive higher investor flows, consistent with these managers improving their ability to exploit investment opportunities through their network connections. Greater network connections are shown to be particularly important in reducing the diseconomies-of-scale for large managers who are well-connected. We also use the exogen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, SNA is an increasingly interdisciplinary field that focuses on a set of actors and the relationships that link them (Borgatti et al, 2009). The theory of social networks aims to explain the structure of relationships between social entities and how social structure influences other social phenomena, such as psychological well-being, reciprocal support and social capital, knowledge management, and financial risk-adjusted performance (Bae et al, 2018;Rossi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, SNA is an increasingly interdisciplinary field that focuses on a set of actors and the relationships that link them (Borgatti et al, 2009). The theory of social networks aims to explain the structure of relationships between social entities and how social structure influences other social phenomena, such as psychological well-being, reciprocal support and social capital, knowledge management, and financial risk-adjusted performance (Bae et al, 2018;Rossi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on ranking influential actors within networks have predominantly focused on individual centrality measures such as Degree centrality, Closeness Centrality, Information Centrality, Betweeness Centrality and Eigenvector Centrality [41], which overlook a unifying ground for the different purpose driven centrality measures. In the view of Rossi, Blake [38] decision making with single attributes turns to side-line of the importance of other equally significant measures in determining worker relevance. The emergence of different measures of influence in social network analysis is the conviction of the unreliableness of the individual measures of centrality in reaching universal reliability as suggested by Deng, Yeh [25] [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas previous studies have focused on CEOs' high network centrality or partially interlocking boards (Cai & Sevilir, 2012;Helmers et al, 2017;Rossi et al, 2018;Skousen et al, 2018), we provide the first fully integrated evidence of the impact of TMT network centrality on corporate bond yield spreads using unique Chinese listed firms across the sample period of 2007 to 2016. We find that the TMT network centrality significantly impacts bond spreads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper makes contributions to the development of social networks from several aspects. First, there is a lot of literature examining the value of CEO or board interlocking network centrality partially (Cai & Sevilir, 2012;Chuluun et al, 2014;Cohen, Frazzini, & Malloy, 2008;El-Khatib et al, 2015;Helmers et al, 2017;Larcker et al, 2013;Rossi et al, 2018;Skousen et al, 2018). In this paper, however, we take all TMT members into account rather than only a few members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%