This study examines misinformation in social networks with well-known network science metrics. We utilize an already available dataset to analyze tweets related to COVID-19 vaccinations. The methodology we use in this study includes the creation of separate networks for retweets, replies, and mentions. We utilized various centrality metrics to assess the importance of individual tweets such as centrality metrics that primarily consider the network’s topology and connectivity, taking into account factors such as the number of connections, the importance of connections , information flow, and indirect influences. One of our objectives is to determine the length of time that tweets linked to unreliable sources exist within a network through reactions. The empirical results of our study reveal a noteworthy association: tweets that have longer durations tend to be posted by influential accounts within the network, in contrast to tweets that have shorter durations and demonstrate reduced influence. Our study contributes to the advancement of our understanding of the dynamics of misinformation spread, by our results regarding misinforma-tion persistence within social networks. Our observations show potential for informing approaches designed to address misinformation and disin-formation, especially in the setting of public health emergencies like as the current COVID-19 outbreak.