2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
180
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
9
180
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, brokers may facilitate cooperation (favoring triadic closure) by selecting the right partners and emphasizing their commonalities when introducing them in order to build successful teams [39]. This trend towards triadic closure appears to be an important driver of network formation over time [56], particularly in clusters [57]. On the other hand, power imbalance resulting from asymmetric access to information and resources in unclosed triads triggers withdrawals by unconnected partners which leads to dissolution of ties and subsequently triad decays.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Brokerage Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, brokers may facilitate cooperation (favoring triadic closure) by selecting the right partners and emphasizing their commonalities when introducing them in order to build successful teams [39]. This trend towards triadic closure appears to be an important driver of network formation over time [56], particularly in clusters [57]. On the other hand, power imbalance resulting from asymmetric access to information and resources in unclosed triads triggers withdrawals by unconnected partners which leads to dissolution of ties and subsequently triad decays.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Brokerage Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Former networking experiences and network structures explain the dynamics of inter-organizational relationships to a great extent [57]. In this vein, through past experiences, brokers accrue the ability to identify sources of information, to assess and synthesize information, and to coordinate flows between sources and recipients [58].…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Brokerage Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, other studies highlight the advantages and benefits of cluster's resources as learning process, knowledge creation (Maskell & Malmberg, 1999), knowledge network (Giuliani, 2007(Giuliani, , 2013, human capital, specialized research tools, suppliers, consumers, manufacturing facilities or services, knowledge spillovers and institutions (McCann & Folta, 2008). However, Hervás-Oliver and Albors-Garrigós (2007) address singularity of resources and capabilities for each cluster, such as skilled labor, social interactions, business sophistication, supplier linkages, network or external linkages, institutional linkages (training and R&D support).…”
Section: Regional Cluster Innovation and Export Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By cluster resources, we understand the set of institutional, network, and geographical proximities advantages that can spill over the performance of firms on the national and/or international levels (Delgado, Porter, & Stern, 2010;Giuliani, 2007Giuliani, , 2013Glaeser & Kerr, 2009;Kukalis, 2010;Maskell, Bathelt, & Malmberg, 2006;Maskell & Malmberg, 1999;McCann & Folta, 2008;MolinaMorales & Martínez-Fernández, 2004). We suggest that as such externalities effects shape and influence the innovation of firms, we consider that the impact of these cluster resources on the export performance of firms will be mediated by the firms' innovation in product and services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorenson, Rivkin, and Fleming (2006), in contrast, argue that innovation clusters are beneficial for those involved in the development of complex technologies where face-to-face communication with collaborators may be useful. Despite these contradictory findings, there is consensus in the literature that geography alone will not guarantee success and that the primary reason for failure is the lack of sufficient collaboration and linkages between players that underpin these clusters (Boschma, 2005;Giuliani, 2013;Leydesdorff & Etzkowitz, 1996;Tallman & Phene, 2007). Furthermore, the failure of these clusters can also be due to insufficient performance monitoring towards desirable innovation outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%