Network meta analysis of four kinds of traditional Chinese fitness methods in the treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly

Yu, Ying

doi:10.37766/inplasy2020.4.0114

Cited by 7 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 46,138 relevant records were obtained from the initial search and 6,468 records were identified from updated search, and after screening, 51 systematic reviews (Liu and Dong, 2021;Zhang et al, 2004;Zhao et al, 2004;Hao, 2005;Hao et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2007;Guo et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2012;Ding et al, 2013;Lu et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Xiong et al, 2013;Zhang and Wei, 2014;Zhao, 2014;Zhao et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2015;Han, 2016;Li et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016;Zhang, 2016;Wang et al, 2017;Yan and Gao, 2017;Yue et al, 2017;Jin et al, 2018;Xiong et al, 2019;Ang et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2020a;Yu et al, 2020a;Yang et al, 2020b;Yu et al, 2020b;Fan et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;He, 2020;Jin et al, 20201992;Liu et al, 2020;Pang et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020;Xiong et al, 2020;Yan et al, 2020;Ze...…”

Section: Results Of the Searching And Screeningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The disease with the largest proportion in the of systematic reviews was COVID-19, with 19 articles (Liu and Dong, 2021;Ang et al, 2020;Fan et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;Pang et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2020;Wang S. et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020;Xiong et al, 2020;Zeng et al, 2020;Zhou L. P. et al, 2021;Zhou F. et al, 2021;Luo et al, 2021;Ouyang et al, 2021), followed by 11 articles on HFMD (Ding et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Xiong et al, 2013;Zhang and Wei, 2014;Xiong et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2020a;Yang Z. et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2020b;He, 2020; Yan Zhang et al, 2004;Zhao et al, 2004;Hao, 2005;Hao et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2012), 4 for tuberculosis (Guo et al, 2010;Yan and Gao, 2017;Yue et al, 2017;Jin et al, 2018), 3 for mumps (Zhao, 2014;Wu et al, 2015;Zhang, 2016), 2 for bacterial dysentery (Han, 2016;…”

Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Included Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The number of RCTs included in each systematic review ranged from 2 to 45. Regarding the type of intervention in the intervention group, TCM combined with Western medicine accounted for the greatest proportion (n = 43, 84.31%) (Liu and Dong, 2021;Fan et al, 2020;Pang et al, 2020;Jin et al, 20201992;Luo et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2020;Zeng et al, 2020;Wang S. et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2020a;Ang et al, 2020;Xiong et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2004;Hao, 2005;Hao et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2004;Zhao et al, 2014;Li et al, 2016;Jin et al, 2018;Yan and Gao, 2017;Yue et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2017;Han, 2016;Wu et al, 2015;Zhang, 2016;Zhao, 2014;Lu et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2016;Zhang and Wei, 2014;Xiong et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Ding et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2020a;Yang et al, 2020b), with two SRs (3.92%) including studies with...…”

Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Included Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical Evidence on the Use of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Acute Infectious Diseases: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Luo

Zhang

et al. 2022

Front. Pharmacol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Acute infectious diseases constitute the most prevalent public health emergency (PHE) in China. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has long been used in the treatment of acute infections, but the overall evidence of its benefit and harm has not been comprehensively and systematically evaluated.Methods: We searched CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Cochrane Library, embase and preprint platforms to retrieve systematic reviews (SRs) on CHM for acute infectious. Participants with COVID-19, SARS, H1N1, tuberculosis, bacillary dysentery, mumps, herpangina, hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD), and other acute infectious diseases were included. Interventional group consisting of patients treated with CHM combined with Western medicine or CHM alone. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the retrieved studies. Information on interventions, control measures and outcomes of the included studies was extracted, and meta-analyses were qualitatively synthesized.Results: A total of 51 SRs and meta-analyses were eligible for this overview, including 19 for COVID-19, 11 for hand-foot-and-mouth disease, 8 for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), 4 for tuberculosis, 3 for mumps, 2 for bacillary dysentery, 2 for H1N1 influenza and 2 for herpangina. Six systematic reviews were of high quality, all of which were on the use of CHM for COVID-19; 24 were of moderate quality; 10 were of low quality; and 11 were of very low quality. CHM appeared to have potential benefits in improving clinical symptoms and signs for most infections with an acceptable safety profile, and the clinical evidence of the benefits of CHM for acute respiratory infections such as COVID-19, SARS and H1N1 seems more sufficient than that for other acute infections.Conclusion: Overall, CHM, both decoction and Chinese patent medicine, used alone or in combination with conventional medicine may offer potential benefits to relieving symptoms of people with acute respiratory infections. Full reporting of disease typing, staging, and severity, and intervention details is further required for a better evidence translation to the responses for PHE. Future CHM research should focus mainly on the specific aspects of respiratory infections such as its single use for mild infections, and the adjunct administration for sever infections, and individual CHM prescriptions for well-selected outcomes should be prioritized.

show abstract

Section: Results Of the Searching And Screeningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Included Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Included Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Evidence on the Use of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Acute Infectious Diseases: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Luo

Zhang

et al. 2022

Front. Pharmacol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) has been inherited and reformed, based on the holistic view of human life, combining Chinese medicine health care with Chinese medicine health preservation, which plays a very good role in strengthening body and preventing disease (7). In recent years, a growing number of studies have reported that TCEs can be used as an alternative therapy for pulmonary function, endurance capacity, and quality of life in patients with COPD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Network Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Different Types of Traditional Chinese Exercises on Pulmonary Function, Endurance Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD

Huang

Song

et al. 2022

Front. Med.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIn recent years, Chinese and international studies have reported that traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) have good therapeutic effects on pulmonary function, endurance capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, only a few studies have reported the differences in the efficacy of different TCEs in the treatment of COPD.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the effects of five TCEs on patients with COPD, including Taijiquan (TJQ), Baduanjin (BDJ), Liuzijue (LZJ), Wuqinxi (WQX), and Yijinjing (YJJ).MethodsAll randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCEs for patients with COPD were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Excerpt Medica Database (EMBASE), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine database (CBM), China Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang database. The search period was from the establishment of each database to August 16, 2021. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane handbook of systematic review, and the network meta-analysis was conducted with R 4.0.2 (Ross Ihaka, Auckland, New Zealand) and ADDIS 1.16.8 (Gert vsn Valkenhoef, Groningen, Netherlands). The effect size was evaluated using the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsA total of 53 RCTs involving 3,924 patients were included. The network meta-analysis results showed that WQX was the most effective in improving FEV1/FVC% score and 6-MWT score. The difference was statistically significant (MD = 8.62, 95% CI 4.46 to 13.04, P < 0.05), (MD = 74.29, 95% CI 47.67 to 102.24, P < 0.05). However, YJJ was the most effective in reducing the CAT score, and the difference was statistically significant (MD = −8.38, 95% CI −13.24 to −3.28, P < 0.05).ConclusionThe existing evidence shows that WQX has advantages over other TCEs in improving pulmonary function and endurance capacity in patients with COPD, while YJJ has advantages in improving the quality of life. Although TCEs show no significant adverse effects, more large-scale, double-blind, and high-quality RCTs are needed in the future to verify the findings of this study.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021293640.

show abstract

“…It includes several practices, such as qigong, tai chi, and the 12words-for-life-nurturing exercise, and becomes increasingly popular worldwide. It is worth mentioning that TCMBE has a variety of subsets, each of them has a unique action, and those subsets have common characteristics that integrate with holistic body concept emphasizing on the integration of body posture, breathing pattern, and mind adjustments to achieve beneficial effects on both mental and physical wellbeing [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traditional Chinese Mind and Body Exercises for Neck Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Xie

Liao²,

Wang

et al. 2021

Pain Research and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Neck pain is common and can have a significant impact on patients’ physical functionality, mobility, and quality of life (QOL). In clinical practice, traditional Chinese mind and body exercise (TCMBE) is a combination of different types of exercise based on traditional Chinese medicine, including qigong, tai chi, the 12-words-for-life-nurturing exercise, and so on, and many studies have found that it is safe and effective at helping patients with neck pain. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of TCMBE on pain intensity, functional mobility, and QOL in individuals with neck pain. Methods. The PubMed, MEDLINE, PEDro, and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of TCMBE on pain intensity, functional mobility, and QOL in individuals with neck pain were included. Screening, data extraction, and literature quality assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. RevMan5.4 software was used for data analysis. Results. Six studies with 716 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control groups, TCMBE had no therapeutic advantage in improving pain intensity (visual analogue scale: mean difference (MD) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): −7.70 to 11.46, and P = 0.70); functional mobility (neck disability index: MD = 0.15, 95% CI: −6.37 to 6.66, and P = 0.96; neck pain and disability scale: MD = 1.31, 95% CI: −4.10 to 6.71, and P = 0.64); or 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores for physical function (MD = 5.58, 95% CI: −8.03 to 19.18, and P = 0.42), general health (MD = 1.87, 95% CI: −4.99 to 8.72, and P = 0.59), body pain (MD = 2.26, 95% CI: −3.80 to 8.32, and P = 0.46), vitality (MD = 6.24, 95% CI: −1.49 to 13.98, and P = 0.11), social function (MD = 8.06, 95% CI: −4.85 to 20.98, and P = 0.22), role physical (MD = –1.46, 95% CI: −8.54 to 5.62, and P = 0.69), or role emotional (MD = 6.5, 95% CI: −3.45 to 16.45, and P = 0.2). However, TCMBE was less effective at improving mental health results based on the SF-36 survey (MD = 3.37, 95% CI: 0.5 to 6.24, and P = 0.02). Conclusions. Based on the meta-analysis, there is insufficient evidence to support the clinical use of TCMBE in improving pain intensity and enhancing functional mobility and QOL in individuals with neck pain.

show abstract

Network meta analysis of four kinds of traditional Chinese fitness methods in the treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Clinical Evidence on the Use of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Acute Infectious Diseases: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Clinical Evidence on the Use of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Acute Infectious Diseases: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Network Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Different Types of Traditional Chinese Exercises on Pulmonary Function, Endurance Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD

Traditional Chinese Mind and Body Exercises for Neck Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About