2021
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1804/1/012124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Performance Evaluation of Different MANET Routing Protocols Configured on Heterogeneous Nodes

Abstract: The recent communication technology tends to be wirelessly for the mobility reason. Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) can be established without any infrastructure or centralized controller. It can be constructed quickly in rural areas, military zones, and in emergency cases like earthquake. Three different types of routing protocols were categorized according to their work’s nature, which are Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid routing protocols. Due to the mobility characteristic of MANET nodes, routing protocols pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results revealed that the OLSR protocol has the highest throughput reaching 6000000 bits/sec among other protocols when implemented in small and big networks. The DSR protocol performed the best when compared to other protocols in terms of the network load (14) . Finally, we have made a comparative analysis of different QoS parameters like throughput, delay, and jitter and by comparing the previous work we found that AODV outperforms all other protocols in terms of delay of 0.24 msec, while OLSR outperforms all other protocols in terms of highest throughput and a better load of 180 bits/sec and 1410 bits/sec as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The simulation results revealed that the OLSR protocol has the highest throughput reaching 6000000 bits/sec among other protocols when implemented in small and big networks. The DSR protocol performed the best when compared to other protocols in terms of the network load (14) . Finally, we have made a comparative analysis of different QoS parameters like throughput, delay, and jitter and by comparing the previous work we found that AODV outperforms all other protocols in terms of delay of 0.24 msec, while OLSR outperforms all other protocols in terms of highest throughput and a better load of 180 bits/sec and 1410 bits/sec as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…49 The most important routing protocols for video transmission in H-MANET are the geographic routing protocol (GRP), optimized link state routing (OLSR), dynamic source routing (DSR), Temporally-ordered routing algorithm (TORA) and Ad hoc on demand distance vector routing (AODV). 50…”
Section: Review Of Qos Based Routing Protocols For Video Transmission...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches for QoS provision at dissimilar stages were discussed, comprising MAC, routing, and cross‐layer levels, and the main features of different solutions and techniques were compared 49 . The most important routing protocols for video transmission in H‐MANET are the geographic routing protocol (GRP), optimized link state routing (OLSR), dynamic source routing (DSR), Temporally‐ordered routing algorithm (TORA) and Ad hoc on demand distance vector routing (AODV) 50 …”
Section: Review Of Qos Based Routing Protocols For Video Transmission...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage is seen in the overhead and consumption of resources in large networks [3]. On the other hand, reactive routing protocols such as Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol (AODV) conduct route discovery only when it is required, and the node utilizes the flooding mechanism to broadcast a request to all nearby nodes to find a new route, and the route remains valid until the route is no longer necessary [4]. The benefit is the small size of the routing table, which contains only the details of nodes lying in the path of the destination, while the disadvantage is frequent link breakage that requires repair, which in turn increases the delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%